Relationships

2 posts / 0 new
Last post
kwesterhof's picture

"Healthy distance protects us from false intimacy. It protects us from the illusion that we actually have relationships with people we've never met or with places we've never been. False intimacy is one of the great temptations of an age that prides itself on technology that eliminates distance. It is also one of the great dangers of mission."  Kris Rocke, Center for Transforming Mission. 

False intimacy.   In an era of "meaningful relationships" morphing into virtual relationships, I was struck by Rocke's comment.   Relationship is so close to the heart of the Gospel and so close to the heart of the process of becoming like Jesus.   God chooses to have a relationship with us, and thus to work in and through us.   And it's becoming more and more clear to me that when we desire to be helpful, or show compassion, or bring about change in someone's life, we need to do that in relationship, not in a vacuum.  

False intimacy with the poor is always a pitfall for those who want to reduce poverty.   We can flaunt our relationships like a credential, or a validation of our commitment.  We can pretend to have the right to "represent" or to speak for others.  We can claim we are serving the poor when we are really serving our own interests.  Friending on facebook doesn't make a friend.  Offering help to someone doesn't make a friend.  False intimacy is one of the great dangers of mission.  What kind of intimacy makes us true missionaries?   In our families?  in our neighborhoods?  in our global outreach?   What do you think?

Hi Karl, Kris Rocke has a interesting take on what isa healthy relationship. Without  reading his material other than what you provided Karl, I can't quite understand what he is saying. I've never been to Heaven, but I consider my relationship with God to be intimate. Any relationship that occurs while helping people for the right reason, cannot be called false. It may not be intimate to you but may be the first time for them. I can't understand Kris Rocke's Spiritual logic. Hey Karl thanks for bringing thia subject up, I sure I could be wrong on his intent.  Thanks Karl

Ken

Post new comment

Login using social networks

You may login with either your assigned username or your e-mail address.
The password field is case sensitive. Don't remember your password? Click here to request a new one.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <strike> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <br> <p>
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
Post new comment


Comment Policy

Subscribe to:

X [Close]

Just click to subscribe to email notifications for this:
- Post (i.e. all new comments in this discussion)
- Author (i.e. anything posted by this person)
- Forum (i.e. all new discussions in this forum)
- Network (i.e. weekly summary of new articles and blogs)

You can choose to get notified instantly when something is posted or on a daily/weekly basis.

Notifications can be adjusted or removed any time. To do so, go to the "Notifications" tab of your Network profile or use the link at the bottom of the emails.



Add a Comment

Latest Comments

Get The Network weekly email!

Don‘t miss the latest blogs, articles, and news from The Network.

Get our weekly recap, delivered right to your inbox every Tuesday.

We will not share your e-mail address with anyone for any reason.