Blog
Preaching should mostly be about saying something nice, but not at the cost of saying nothing at all in case the soundness of the faith is threatened.
July 22, 2014 1 1 comments
Resource, Book or Booklet
This book presents an alternative model for churches, from its leadership structure to its mobilization of the laity, that hopes to recreate the church Jesus and the apostles cultivated: a church not chasing the wind but rather going into the world and making disciples of Jesus.
July 17, 2014 0 0 comments
Blog
The question has been raised by many in the church as to why there needs to be genuine unity and connectedness among believers.
July 7, 2014 0 0 comments
Blog
When sermonating or reading at my office, I get interrupted. So, yesterday I did something different. I went to the library to get some work done. I got more done in two hours than I had in the week. But it felt weird. I hadn’t been interrupted...
June 27, 2014 1 4 comments
Blog
Mondays are the days in which I rest, relax, enjoy a cup of coffee in the morning and pretty much try as hard as I can to do nothing. Unless absolutely important, I try to do no church work on a Monday.
June 16, 2014 1 0 comments
Blog
I hear more stuff that makes me wonder sometimes – “Are we running a business, or some organization…. or are we a church?
June 11, 2014 2 1 comments
Blog
“In a typical congregation of 200 adults, 50 will experience depression at some point, and at least 30 are currently taking antidepressants.” (Dan Blazer, Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Duke University, in Christianity Today, March 2009). What could that mean for your church's preaching, programming, pastoral care, and congregational care?
June 9, 2014 1 1 comments
Blog
I want to remind you of a trusted faith formation resource provider: Faith Alive Christian Resources. The Faith Alive 2014-2015 catalog is full of Sunday school curriculum, Bible studies, and other resources to help people of all ages to grow in faith.
June 6, 2014 1 0 comments
Blog
As summer approaches, I've been reflecting on a subtle language shift around summer plans. Can we recover a glimpse of creational goodness by altering our language from summer vacations toward summer "holy-days"?
May 27, 2014 2 2 comments
Resource, Book or Booklet
This book presents a incredibly comprehensive vision for how pastors and ministry leaders can adapt to a post-Christian culture without abandoning orthodox theology. It offers challenging insights and provocative questions based on Keller's more than 20 years of ministry in an urban context.
May 16, 2014 0 0 comments
Blog

Most weeks, I receive a note or two regarding the Sunday service. They are usually encouraging. Father God knows I need them. Most Monday’s, I suffer a little bit from what I call my “Elijah moment”. I feel like I’m the only one left in Horeb  (Read 1 Kings 19:10). Your notes pick me up,...

May 14, 2014 0 0 comments
Blog
A while back I was at a classis leadership event and noticed that most of the presenters were not “home grown”. It got me wondering whether something ought to be done about it.
May 13, 2014 0 1 comments
Discussion Topic
I realized this was a challenge for churches when I saw the large role expectations played in the relationship between pastors and churches, particularly when stated expectations were not met, but even more so when unstated expectations were not.
May 1, 2014 3 5 comments
Blog
In life and in ministry, I need to be reminded that what I have related to as “initial success” is different than “impact.”
April 11, 2014 0 0 comments
Resource, Report
This survey focused on United Methodist clergy, but I would guess that it's conclusions are broadly applicable to clergy from many denominations. "Answering God's call shouldn't be bad for your health. But for about half of all ordained United Methodist clergy, it is."
April 2, 2014 0 0 comments
Blog

I have been given a Sabbatical by my Council and congregation and as part of it I am enrolled in a three credit course through Tyndale Seminary in Toronto on the "Spirituality of Henri Nouwen. The course is taught by Dr. Wil Hernandez who has written a three volume analysis of Nouwen's "...

March 25, 2014 0 1 comments
Blog
If there’s one disadvantage to knowing Bible stories, it’s that they don’t always surprise us anymore. Take the story of Jesus’ transfiguration. That Jesus’ clothes become dazzling white and that Moses and Elijah show up...
March 21, 2014 0 0 comments
Blog
Some years ago I attended a session of one congregation’s long-term visioning project. When the gathering was discussing hopes for the church’s future worship and preaching, one 40 year-old mom spoke for her small team and said, “We really think that we should have more preaching on contemporary topics—something other than the Lectionary..."
February 11, 2014 1 8 comments
Blog
February marks the 25th anniversary of when I started to follow Jesus Christ. Though I was raised in a Christian home and my parents afforded me the opportunity to attend Christian schools, I had deliberately walked away from God. I remember being angry with God about a number of things and saying rather defiantly at one point “I don’t need you...
February 4, 2014 0 2 comments
Blog
One of my pastoral priorities for this quarter is preaching. Accordingly, I’m reading Cornelius Plantinga Jr.’s, Reading for Preaching (Eerdmans, 2013). I appreciate the guidance that Rev. Plantinga gives in his book. His message that reading is important to the preacher comes through loud and clear. Good reading makes you wiser, and improves your...
February 4, 2014 0 0 comments
Blog
Funerals, like weddings, are family matters. So says, the church order. But it is never so simple. Families are part of communities. We come together, usually in church, to remember a person and comfort each other in the light of the good news of Christ... 
January 28, 2014 0 2 comments
Blog
We hear a great deal about our Biblical mandate to get the gospel out to the lost. I don’t want to minimize that in any way. But the fact of the matter is the early church set the precedent for us by reaching out with a mandate to encourage as they spread the gospel of grace. With many Christians beyond our denominational walls so totally overwhelmed and discouraged...
January 28, 2014 0 5 comments

Pages

RSS

"Preaching should mostly be about saying something nice, but not at the cost of saying nothing at all in case the soundness of the faith is threatened." Really? Someone should speak to Paul Washer, David Wilkerson or Leonard Ravenhill.

I can't imagine any minister would disagree that sermon preparation is only one part of ministry.  That would be a pretty tough position to defend.

As Joshua Benton has correctly described of Jesus, "He took time to pray, he took time to connect with The Father, he took time to rest."

Regardless of how he used certain private moments, it's easy to picture those moments of Jesus' life as being free from interruption.  

While I have times where I do receive people who appear and phone calls that spontaneously arrive.  My only point is that I need pockets of time that are free from interruption from time to time, too.   Whether it is for another step forward in preparing the sermon or for going to bed for the night.  In the case of emergencies, there are even exceptions to guarding those important moments.  

Guarding certain pockets of time within reason is a necessary part of ministry for me.  It enables me to see certain commitments to the ministry through to completion.  I wouldn't dream of walking out of a board meeting to go work on my sermon; I wouldn't interrupt pastoral counseling with a grieving family to start making phone calls or to receive another parishioner who suddenly appears (again, unless it was an even more urgent emergency).  Why should assembling the gift of a good Sunday sermon warrant any less care?

The author of the article indicates that interruptions are an important reality in ministry.  I completely agree.  

But, never guarding certain pockets of time from interruption would not work for me.  It would be chaotic.  It could open the door to not being dependable.  It would be rude and disrespectful to parishioners who need and deserve a moment with a fully engaged pastor.   

posted in: Work: Interrupted

I appreciate both of your observations and reflections on this post. I agree that preaching the Word is very important to faith formation and it is central to worship. I also agree that careful preparation is needed to faithfully preaching God's Word. It is something exciting and also terrifying to do each Sunday (for some, twice a Sunday). It is a great responsibility to correctly and faithfully preach His word. Yet ministry isn't about just that. It is part of it but not the only part of it. Reading through the Gospels, yes, Jesus took time away from people. He didn't take time to prepare his sermon on the mount though. He took time to pray, he took time to connect with The Father, he took time to rest. Reading through the Gospels, Jesus was about people. He was about the sinners, the tax collectors, those on the fringes. He even calls the pharisees to repentance and invites them into the kingdom.

I find that the word "balance" is tossed around as an excuse to hide away rather than engage; to evade rather than encounter. Reading the Gospels, Jesus lived rhythm not balance. He lived in a rhythm of doing God's work and then rest and prayer (for example, he went to pray before and after important events in the book of Mark). He had a rhythm of work and rest. You're welcome to check out my blog where I look more into this subject of work and rhythm here http://spiritualmusclehead.wordpress.com/2014/06/16/coffee-rest-and-work/ here http://spiritualmusclehead.wordpress.com/2013/11/14/sweet-hour-of-prayer/ here http://spiritualmusclehead.wordpress.com/2011/12/14/the-art-of-not-doing/ here http://spiritualmusclehead.wordpress.com/2012/10/30/the-art-of-silence/ and here http://spiritualmusclehead.wordpress.com/2013/07/23/be-still-2/

Rhythm is important to doing ministry. God created the world in 6 days and rested on the 7th, not because he had to because he was tired but because he knew rhythm. Jesus lived this rhythm, not balance. Engaging people helps me engage God's word. If I do not know what someone is going through, how I can faithfully speak God's word to them, allowing the Spirit to move in their hearts?

Thank you again for your comments and observations and thoughts. May God bless you in doing his kingdom work

posted in: Work: Interrupted

It's interesting that scripture tells us Jesus would slip away from the crowds to the mountains to pray.  Not even his disciples were around.  It would seem that during those moments Jesus was not interrupted.  Perhaps the Savior valued balance.  Like Doug Bouws has indicated, I find it important to engage people when they appear, guarding their time with me from interruption.  And its necessary to have stretches of concentrated time to prepare for Sundays.  I find it necessary and rewarding to have this type of balance.

posted in: Work: Interrupted

I've been going to the library for years to get sermon work done.  I make little or no progress at the office.  I set aside time to be interrupted (when i'm at home/at the office), and time when I can focus and think without being interrupted.   If I didn't my sermons would never get finished.  You can accomplish ministry by engaging people when they are appear or you can accomplish ministry by being able to think clearly and write a good sermon.  I think both are important.

posted in: Work: Interrupted

Thanks, Ken.  Good stuff.

- Dave Vroege, Halifax

posted in: Life Together

Hi there,

The links to the talks are not working. I would love to listen to these talks, do you have alternative links?

 

Thanks,

Larry, 

A resource you might be interested in is Key Ministry's blog, Church4EveryChild, written by Dr. Steve Grcevich. He regularly writes about how the church can include families and individuals impacted by mental illness. 

Thanks for shedding light on this import topic!

Katie

Hi Chris,

Thank you for this blog post.  I like your angle.  We too "vacate" a bit during the summer, as we love to go camping and visit family.  But like you suggest, I'm trying to take more "Sabbath" during my vacation.  Slowing things down, reading more, spending more time in quiet.  We also spend considerable time in our backyard, working in the garden, but also spending time in solitude and silence, in God's creation.  But as much as we enjoy staying home during summer holiday time, we've also learned to get a way a bit, as you'll know that when a pastor is home, he is "on-call."

May the Lord bless our Summer-Sabbath breaks!

--Leon

I once had a wise spiritual director say words to me that I will never forget and that have helped guide my life ever since: She said, "Consider the things that bring you life; consider the things that bring you death; and don't do violence to yourself." Work for me includes both those things that bring life, and those that bring death; and I can tell when the balance gets shifted and I need to make some changes. The Lord has created us with a need for Sabbath, for rest, for the renewing and refreshing of our souls. This blog is thought-provoking for me. What brings life to my soul? A vacation-day or a holy-day?

This article touches on something I heard recently. John MacArthur (Masters Seminary) made this statement. "There are two large global movements currently in place. One is the Charismatic and the other is Reformed." I wonder why we seem to be in wane here in N.America and yet globally we see a growing influence of Reformed minded. Any thoughts on this obserevation? 

posted in: Supply Management

Thanks Jeff. Those resources are added to my togettoread list.

Appreciate it. Thanks Kim.

Pete,

The book "Studying Congregations:A New Handbook" by Nancy Ammerman may be helpful to you, especially the chapter by Robert Schreiter that speaks about surfacing the "implicit theology" of a congregation. My first thought is that this is the kind of question that lends itself to a qualitative method, not a quantitative "check this box" type. "Ethnography as a Pastoral Practice" by Mary Clark Moschella may also be helpful.

Thanks for the suggestion. We've made the change.

To those who run the network. I would have liked to have this posted under the topic of "Transitional Ministry" or, fitting what we call it in the CRC, "Specialized Transitional Ministry." If that can be done then my intent will have been fully achieved.

Len, I think that you are right on the money.  About 15 years ago I started having a fair amount of contact with the Anglican community where I live and found that the generally shorter sermon and the weekly celebration of the Eucharist gave worship a completeness that I found lacking in the CRC.  The shorter sermon had the additional benefit of much less repetition on the part of the person preaching.   I have been heavily involved in worship planning at over the past 15 years at my home church and have become much more convinced that there are 5 worship pillars: Praise, Confession and reconciliation, prayer, the Word and sermon or homily, Eucharist.  Each of these pillars in my view are equally important and I think we have been short changed by the emphasis on preaching. 

Thanks Len, for your enthusiastic support of the weekly celebration of the Lord's Supper. 

Of course, in our survey we did not take a particular position on frequency but we did ask the question. Of the Protestant congregations surveyed 20% celebrate the Lord's Supper each week, 67% once a month, 10% less than once per month, and 3% two to three times a month.

I don't know if those stats confirm your assertion of a movement of including the Lord's Supper every week.Perhaps there are other surveys to which we may compare this data?   

My reaction to the survey is a resounding "duh."  Since reformation churches have been experiencing the "centrality of the sermon" for centuries, it's no wonder that the people on the pew think it's the main event. 

The real issue is what we left behind in this historical evolution. What we left behind is the dual foci of word and sacrament that goes all the way back to the New Testament and early church (and was advocated by Calvin himself). 

Today there is a remarkable movement across the board, from Reformed to Pentecostal, of balancing the Word with the Eucharist every Lord's Day. For example, check out the number of CRC and RCA church plants that have instituted weekly Eucharist from the start. If you attend a church that has rediscovered this ancient practice, you will realize that the sermon is enriched, embodied, and affirmed when the congregation gathers at the table to receive Christ in the bread and wine. 

As Dutch theologian Von Alman put it: ending the service without the Supper is like ending a sentence with a colon rather than a period.  Something important and climactic is missing. 

 

This sounds like an interesting course! I'll be interested in reading what you share. 

In response to Larry: I don't think rehearsing and remembering the story or the cross is exactly a way to live in the thrall of the devil or to do an end-run on the victory of Easter.  What do we do each time we come to the Lord's Table but remember: "This is my body . . . my blood."   We do remember the cross--we never put it behind us.  It is the locus of our salvation that leads us with gratitude to Easter and beyond.   And anyway, I don't think the rhythms of the Christian Year per se keep us down or away from Easter.   In fact, if you want to see something that really whallops one with a sense of sin and penitence, few things do this as well as the very serious Preparatory Form for the Lord's Supper that the CRCNA traditionally used the week before the sacrament.   Just sayin' . . .

posted in: Mardi Gras

I wonder how often Jesus and his disciples shared laughs together. I wonder whether Jesus' sense of humor was more slapstick, or droll, or punny, or ??? I wonder whether they teased each other. If they did, I expect Peter gave and took more of it than anyone: "Hey, Peter, think you can walk all way way across this puddle without sinking?" 

Yes Scott I can identify.  I grew up in the CRC of the 1950's and 60's in Leota MN.  I never heard about the liturgical year until way after Seminary. I had a hard time accepting it mainly becasue I did not think it proper to relive the history of redemption in our personal lives.  "It is finished" seemed to me to mean enough with the sin problem.  The cross is behind us.  I still have trouble with this business of repeating the story of redemption to be honest.  Why can we not live in the power of the resurrection every Sunday and every day?  Is this not a waste of time? A tyrranical hold of the evil one to keep us in the defeat of our sin rather than in the once for all victory of our Lord?  Is this not pretending that we live in Romans 7 and have not yet moved on to Romans 8?  I do not think our Pentecostal brothers and sisters practice this, I doubt whether more conservative Reformation churches do such as the Protestant Reformed, URC, or even PCA? Also Advent has been turned into a  mini-lenten season.  Sometimes I long for the good ole Leota days when we liturically sinned with a passion.

posted in: Mardi Gras

Hello Scott,

Thank you for this article.  I also grew up in a non-liturgical ("free") church tradition, which I appreciate.  But in recent years, I've been wanting more--more beauty, more ritual, more depth.  And like you, I'm finding it in the pattern and practices of the Christian year.  The ongoing challenge I have is how to engage my people in these practices.  I'm doing it slowly, trusting that, as James K. A. Smith teaches, they will form us all into more devoted students of Christ.

Have a blessed Lenten journey!

--Leon

posted in: Mardi Gras

If we truly believe that Jesus lives in us by his Holy Spirit, we don't need such annual, ritual reminders of Calvary's cross derived from Roman Catholicism. If we need such a reminder, no amount of organized Lenten activities will make a difference.

Thank you for your summary of this book. Some CRC pastors are implementing the seven dynamics of being led by Holy Spirit. They are also facilitating the training.

There is a one day overview, of the 4 day workshop, in Guelph on March 22/14. I am asking a number of people from our church to attend. As one pastor said, "this must be a grassroots initiative and the leadership must be fully invested".

John A. Algera, in his book, "Signs & Wonders - page 97", states, "In reformed circles, an underemphasis on the work and power of Holy Spirit has tradionally existed, along with a fear of any manifestationof Holy Spirit that cannot be controlled or predicted".
As if we could control God.

Thanks for reminding me to work on the book I am writing regarding my mom and dad's story.

Finding acceptance in a local body can lead a person to Christ.  It may take a while, but everyone desires acceptance and what better place than a body of believers who truly love God.  Some people have never felt accepted whether inside or outside the church.  So, therefore, they have trouble feeling accepted anywhere.  Those that we don't like, love them anyway.  Those who are quiet and shy, shake their hand and say "Hi" everytime the church doors are open and you see them in the grocery store, etc, even if we think they are wierd.  This is where Godly discernment is needed.  Love is the greatest gift. 

Jim, how good to hear from you again.  I remember when we often talked before or after worship in our University days before I used the commoon lectionary in preaching. This is what I learned since then.

In 1983, 26 years after ordination, I was allowed a six-month sabbatical for study and writing.  Three months were spent at Princeton Seminaray.  For the final 15 years of my ministry I preached from the lectionary in the morning service and mostly taught from the Confessions in the evening.

I experienced freedom and discipline in a new way.  Each week I started with the four texts given by the ecumenical church instead of my choices of the "right texts."  That plunged me into the discipline of preparing to preach from less than familiar texts than I would have chosen.  I also learned the discipline of taking "contemporary situations" or congregational tragedies and setting them in the context of the text(s) for the day to listen for the Word.  And, knowing my own limitations and the "light" that a given text yields.  I also learned when and how to "punt," meaning, when to depart from the lectionary as a servant for the day.

I also enjoyed hearing a parishioner who, having missed worship in our church on a Sunday, report that "We heard a sermon in Georgia on Sunday from your lectionary text."

Thanks, Jim.  How abouat lunch on High Street Again?

Roger

There are benefits to lectionary preaching.  However, I find lectionary preaching insufficient if we truly want to preach the whole Bible to all of God's People.  The lectionary leaves out significant and important chunks of Scripture (notice how few passages there are from Revelation) and its pericope divisions don't always make sense.  Furthermore, follwing the church seasons/calendar makes much more sense in a rural setting than in most urban settings.  For a banker or a single mom there isn't much difference between December 18, March 18 or October 18.  The rhythms of the lectionary are beautiful for people who relate to them, but it was written for a different time and place.

Since we must preach a text in its context, following the lectionary is additionally hard because it necessitates significantly more background study week after week. 

My practice that has worked very well is to follow John Stott's pattern in "Between Two Worlds."  Preach through a book of the Bible.  Alternate between an Old Testament book and a New Testament Book.  Then on the last Sunday of each month take a break and preach from God's word about a contemporary issue.  It's amazing how many life issues are addressed in the pages of scripture when we simply let the Bible speak to us as it was written.

Duane, I fully agree with you that most parishioners don't believe their pastors understand their concerns.  That doesn't mean however, the author of scripture doesn't understand their concerns.  Our challenging task is to understand the text in its context and help our audiences grasp that while we as preachers may not understand - God understands.  I love the illustration from Haddon Robinson who related the following story.  His son was just ordained as a pastor.  He said to his son.  "What does a young guy like you have to say to an old guy like me that I don't already know."  His son responded, "Nothing dad.  I don't have anything to say to you - but Scripture does, that's why I preach from the Text."  AMEN!

Yes, I see.   The data you cite is heart breaking.  It make a giant leap in my mind to the question of why the increasing numbers of article 17s....   could it be that the loving relationship between pastor and flock gets weakened by preaching that seems disconnected, and then flaws take center stage and resentment follows.... 

It certainly can.  I just think we overestimate how much our preaching connects with people's lives. I thought it was interesting that the post begins with her cry of the heart and then all of a sudden we're talking about lectionary instead of what she might have to teach us about preaching that engages (or doesn't engage) people where they are.  I have no strong opinions about lectionary.  I have very strong opinions that we need to listen to that 40 year old mom a lot more.  I can't put my finger on the data right now, but there has been plenty of survey data over the years to support the assertion that most people do not believe their preacher really understands their life.  That's my concern.  

 

DK, I want to think that competent preaching using the lectionaries would in fact speak to the 40 year old mom's heart.  Would you agree?

 

I'd rather talk about the 40 year old mom's cry of the heart.  

 

Good points all, Jim and Todd.  Thanks for a thoughtful discussion!

Jim,

I appreciate the post.  While I have not followed the lectionary through an entire liturgical year, I have found it particularly helpful during the seasons of Advent and Lent.  The collection of texts:  OT, Psalm, Gospel, and Epistle follows the moves weaves together the texts that lead us from God's promise to the Incarnation, from ministry in Galillee to the empty tomb on Resurrection Sunday.  

What I have particularly appreciated about the lectionary is that it is a faithful guide to lead preacher and congregation through the major themes of God's salvation plan.

I point the finger at myself as I share that the lectionary also keeps me from what I perceive to be the tempation of putting together the gimmick sermon series all done with the intent of keeping things "fresh."  As one parishoner shared with me during this past Christmas season, "Sometimes we forget, but it is is the 'old, old story' that we need to hear.  Everything else is tinsel and ornaments.  It's nice for a while, but after a few weeks, we put it back in a box and forget about it for another year."

While I am glad that I am not bound to the lectionary as some other religious traditions might be, I am thankful that I have the lectionary as a resource to enrich my preaching.

I do not know where to start.  Most of what you say is beyond dispute. Thanks for such a well thought out response. However I do not know who are what you are speaking of when you refer to the "gospel according to today's evangelism."  Is this a reference to ministers in the CRC, perhaps a specific group of CRC pastors?  I do know that the greek (euangelizo) from which we get the word evangelism is used nearly synomously with the greek word for preach (parakaleo)  I know that the angel  "evangelized" the shepherds (Luke 2:10), that Jesus proclaimed the evangel ( Mk1: 15) and Paul was not ashamed of the evangel and was eager to evangelize (preach) to the people in Rome.  This leads me to think that we could call all our preachers evangelists and that our task is to evangelize the world.  I have a very high regard for evangelism as well as preaching because they are one and the same.  But the audiences change.  Not the gospel.  Paul makes this clear in 1 Corinthians 9: 19-23.  It seems then that the preacher must adapt his message for the benefit of his audience so that "by all means we/I might save some."

Thanks

Larry 

Let me rephrase the question.  If evangelism is the essence and/or the primary function of the church, why did Paul not appoint evangelism committees instead of consistories?  Evangelism as popularly understood deals with only opening the door to Christ.  To make that the primary task of the church is like saying that the primary task of marriage is conceiving children.  The actual conception, the joining of sperm and egg takes only a very few seconds: then follows 9 months of gestation and 20 years of parenting.  Apparently the primary task of the church is door keeping. 

As far as the gospels and Acts being filled with evangelism, that fact is that the great majority of the preaching of Jesus was to the Old Testament Church, to both the faithful and the fallen.   The same is true in the first part of Acts.  Jesus preached in synagogues and Paul, immediately after his conversion began preaching in synagogues.

In the great commission Jesus sent old covenant believers, now new covenant believers into the world to make, not converts, but disciples.  He sent Israel into the world to gather the nations into Israel.  But they were first sent to Jerusalem, then to Judea and Samaria, and finally to the ends of the earth.  Transitioning from unbelief to faith usually doesn’t take long.  Making disciples takes a lifetime: thus consistories instead of evangelism committees.

There really are not two E’s, one for joining Christ and the other for living in him.  There is the common perception that the “gospel” is for the unchurched and a different message is for the church.  This suggests that there is one gospel for being joined to Christ and another gospel for remaining in Christ: one gospel for baptism and a second gospel for the Lord’s Supper.

 Paul knew only one “evangel”, one gospel.  His primary task was not converting people and changing their lives, but rather preaching Christ.  “We preach not ourselves but Jesus Christ as Lord. “  Paul’s commission was to “bear the name of Christ to the nations.  Whether he was in the synagogue, the town square or the newly formed churches – he had only one message – Christ.  I am determined to know nothing amongst you except (the bodily risen) Christ and him crucified.  The one GOSPEL is God’s power to give the gift of faith and to maintain the life of faith.   Note also that Paul spent a great deal of is time and energy building up the churches.

Furthermore, the “gospel” of today’s evangelism is not gospel at all.  The witnessing today takes basically two forms.  The first is “God love you and has a wonderful plan for your life” and the second is “I want to tell the world that I am a Christian”.  The first concentrates on the person needing change and the second on the person trying to effect change.

The first is not biblically accurate – think of those drowned in the flood or the Red Sea.  The risen Lord’s plan for Paul was to experience a great deal of suffering and Paul later says that all who would life godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution ( II Tim 3:12).  How many apostles were martyred?   The second is essentially talking about yourself and your marvelous spiritual experiences: in doing so the believer replaces Christ with himself.  This is forbidden by the first and second commandments.

Furthermore, these are exactly the two methods used in modern advertising.  Buy our product and your life will be changed.   Drink our beer or use our cosmetics and you will enjoy the good life.  The second is the personal testimony – I have used this product and it has changed my life – and it could change yours also.

Our life of faith cannot even begin to approach the sinless perfection and flawless faith and obedience of the Lord Jesus.  The gospel is always about the risen Christ once crucified and his personal redemptive experiences.  His life of faith and obedience has reconciled us to the Father and continues to sustain and nurture us.  This is the heart of the one gospel.  Paul had one passion – I want to know Christ, the power of his resurrection and the fellowship of his sufferings.  He had one goal in life – make this Christ known.  The apostles didn’t talk much about themselves – they had a great deal to say about Christ and for good reason.

To split the church’s task into two, I would suggest, seriously distorts the biblical message.  We need to return to the singularity of the biblical gospel and learn to share Paul’s passion for Christ.

Every January our church takes a break from regular adult Sunday school classes and we meet all together and hear people share testimonies. Two or three people are selected to share each week - they know ahead of time so can prepare. Some share how they first came to faith, some share a more recent experience of how God has met them in various life circumstances. The stories have been inspirational over the years and I look forward to every January to see how God is working among us. An added benefit is connecting with people that I might not otherwise, and getting to know them, even a little bit, on a different level. I had the privilege of sharing a few years ago - my story of meeting Christ at a Young Life camp when I was in high school and having the trajectory of my life completely changed. A few weeks ago my husband shared his very different story of growing up in a Christian home, going to church, and to Christian schools - and yet something in his mid-50s led him to seek a renewed relationship with the Lord. It was a beautiful testimony. And my husband was affirmed as people came up afterward to talk with him about how they could relate to his story and benefitted from hearing it. God is glorfied as we share how He meets us, even and maybe especially in our own failure and weakness. It takes a willingness to be vulnerable, to be honest, and to take a risk. And I believe the Lord will honor that.

These lines of Jim Dekker are no longer recent but they are still very relavent.

I understand, I (we) have been there.

Jim's article will have been read and re-read.  Forcussing for the moment on congregational response to sorrow in the parsonage, a few things come to mind. The ministry is demanding emotionally and spiritually, so pastoral care to the  pastor-couple is very important. Hopefully congregations have a pastoral alertness, so that there is a spontaneous ongoing sharing of consolation and comfort. One never "gets over" sorrow.

But the elders should also  provide regular care for  to their shepherd. All grieving people find it disconcerting when, after some time, no mention is made any more of their grief-burden.

But, as well, because of the pastor's work and position, he/she  should not hesitate to seek professional help.

There will be some readers of 'NETWORK' who will want to share some thoughts on the Pastor practicing 'self-care.'

 

 

 

 

Could it be because the gospels and Acts make it very clear.

Why is it that the greatest missionary the church has known, the apostle Paul, when he writes to the churches  says next to nothing about evangelism?

Good thoughts, George.

I am reminded of Mark Wilson's comment about Paul's first missionary journey--when Paul and Barnabas were in Derbe (Acts 14:20) they were about one decent mountain away from Tarsus, and home. Instead of crosssing that mountain they turned around and visited every church that they had just planted a few weeks earlier. Strictly for the purpose of encouraging them and establishing them. Let us follow in their steps, in whatever way we can.

Great article. Funerals have come a long way. I attended one this past week where they played Frank Sinatra "My Way" along with songs by the Gaithers. In the past, I have been to funerals which hardly mentioned the deceased or their life. As you mentioned, we can show gratitude to God by sharing stories of this person - what better way? Real concrete ways. I hope that when I have entered the heavenly realm, people can see the love of God, the work of God through memories they have of me. I may not have been perfect but Grace is all I needed. May I also add, that I do not like it when people preplan their funeral by saying "no funeral, no gathering etc." Funerals are for the living, for those left behind to grieve , not the deceased.  It is a family matter but that depends on your vision of family - my family includes those related by blood but also those related by the blood of Christ, those related by friendship, love and support. A favourite new quote by Ram Dass - "we are all just here to walking each other home".

Neil, I would like to suggest that a minister of the church does not have to lead the memorial service.  In my own case, my immediate family members have absolutely no connections to the pastor of my church because they live far away.  They know, however, that my faith community is central to my life, and they will honour that. So, I have suggested that certain family members they know can serve as the leader.  No sermon is mandatory, but the presence of Christ and words of comfort can be shared in so many other ways than just during a sermon.  Maybe I am just a rebellious person :-), but I just want to put it out there that there is lots of room for creativity.   Diane Plug

There are some underlying issues here - Of course we would like people to be loyal to their CRC church - but that should certainly not be the only reason they attend! The goal must not be to have a group of people who come to church out of a dutiful sense of loyaly, or because they've always attended that church. The goal is a vital community with the Lord (including the Spirit) and with one another.

If the reason a church leader would contact a non-attending member is to "check up" on them because they are concerned about keeping the church's numbers up; that's a serious problem. People enjoy being genuinely cared for - and even missed. A call to say we missed you on Sunday, showing concern for a person including their spiritual health is apprecicated - I don't see how that's anything like being called into a principle's office - unless of course the only reason the person is attending is out of a sense of loyal duty.

Yes, but . . . not only is it a sign of community and courtesy for people to let the church know they are thinking about leaving, but isn’t it a sign of mutual community when the church “chases down” the missing member sooner rather than later, even if it may not make a difference to their staying? It may leave the door open for their returning.

Also, it’s not only an issue of discipleship but isn't it also a sign of the need to find ways to develop community?  If people feel that they belong they may be less apt to leave.  In this individualistic age, how can we encourage greater “stick to each other” community?

Lived through it.  Have the T-shirt.  It seems to me like there is an absence of the Spirit.  I don't know how else to explain why it is that the local congregation most often acts like a service organization and the congregants act like consumers. 

Thanks for your comments, Ray. You also bring up something very interesting. In the days when the interstate highway system was being made in the U.S., there was a concerted effort by various business and government interests, not to mention pressure from consumers, to expand the availability of automobiles, accessible highway infrastructure, and homes that lined up with the proverbial "American dream". That pressure lead to the ballooning of our suburbs, and to far greater individual mobility. 

One could argue (see the fantastic book, "Sidewalks in the Kingdom") that this movement lead pretty directly to "big box" stores, shopping malls with acres of parking lots and, arguably, the whole concept of "church shopping". If none of us owns a vehicle, then we are limited to being able to go to only the churches we can walk to.

Add in to that the increased notoriety of "superstar" preachers through increased access to television, and the ubiquity of advertising that lauded the individuals right to choose, and it's sometimes a wonder to me that anyone is loyal to a local congregation.

your questions about how we can minister to people who are in this mode of thinking/living is an excellent one. As near as I can tell, a huge part if a potential solution is discipleship--intentially apprenticing people in the ways of the gospels and not the world. That being said, I'd love to hear anyone's thoughts on this. These are big questions for Christ-followers in North America. 

You make very good points that the church is not just a service organization, and I totally agree, BUT too many in the church treat it like it is a service club. How does the church minister to people witth that mind set? Far too many in the North American church are content to sit in the pew, listen to a great worship band, hear an engaging sermon, have a nice visit with their frinds after church, then act the rest of the week like nothing happened at church. If the band isn't good enough or the pastor is boring, then they look for a church that has those things. I live in a small town with just one CRC, so we can't church hop when ever we want. That is a good thing I believe, because it forces us to work together with all generations, we do not always get what we want, but the strength of our church becomes our community. 

 

Pages