When deacons gather, what makes those gatherings powerful? What makes them relevant? What makes them really hum? Some deacons' assemblies have faded into oblivion. Is resuscitation possible? Advisable? Here are some thoughts from Jay Van Groningen.
Diaconal Assemblies that work the best are those:
1. Where deacons voluntarily assemble (not under duress and not by some externally imposed mandate)
2. Where they share a geographic presence because ministry is always done in a time and place. Ministry partners share geography.
3. Where the meeting is designed for learning and exchange of ideas.
4. Where the meeting is designed to work together; What can we do together that we cannot do alone? What is our shared ministry context and work load?
5. Where the meeting is ecumenical and a gathering of the "deacons" from all interested churches that share the geography because ministry is geographically rooted and not a denominational story (regardless of whether they have the title deacon or not)
6. Where some of the focus is on community formation and community strengthening, because ministry is a give and take activity, not one directional; It is reciprocal when done best.
7. That go beyond the scope of "one at a time" mercy and benevolence ministry; together they address root causes and they conspire and act together to change the systems perpetuating poverty in our community.
The Canadian context is so different than the US. It may be more helpful in the US to talk about a conference or an assembly focusing on relief, development and justice ministries.
