There are many people working in science who do not hold to evolution, and yet are scientists, some with a PhD in science, or M.Sc. or BSc. Does an ecumenical attitude allow respect for these scientists, or is our ecumenical approach limited to "churchy" practices, or theological beliefs?
How do we as Christians get involved in discussions where literalists and "genre-ists" have different views about Genesis 1-11? How do YEC and OEC people examine these issues together? Or must they simply build a big fence between them and turn their backs on one another?
How would the church go about disciplining a retired pastor who suggests and promotes changing many of the core CRC doctrines?
A quote from Anthony Furey of the Edmonton Sun paper indicates the proportion of various perspectives within the Muslim belief community. The high percentages surprised me to some extent, and I wonder what impacts this would have on our missional efforts.
When churches start becoming experts on pipelines and ecology, does that mean oil companies can become experts on theology?
Which confessions would then be more ecumenical, and more significant?
If the delegates would vote yes, opposite to the vote of classis , then what is the point of classis voting on it at all?
Here is a video which shows how a half-dozen scientists who originally were raised in the evolutionary paradigm have been persuaded by the evidence that the evidence for evolution is lacking.
Do most people still participate in devotions with their children daily? And what do those devotions consist of?