Sam Hamstra
I am an Executive Search Consultant with the Rukes Search Group, as well as a retired CRCNA pastor. I have had the privilege of serving congregations in both the RCA and CRCNA. When I am not working, I am hanging out with my family or reading a book or fishing in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan or serving as the Commissioner of the Chicago Suburban Baseball League or playing piano.
Posted in: Five Steps to Denominational Renewal - Part 2
Darren, thank you for your contribution to this conversation. You encouraged me to do "some double checking and write in such a way as to how you see your hopes and dreams being realized in the context of the CRCNA." I found that suggestion interesting and. perhaps, telling. Here's what I mean: I am a pastor in the field, serving local congregations (from several denominations, including the CRCNA) where I am not seeing the denomination serve the mission of the local church. But I am to do research to be convinced that the denomination is, in fact, advancing the mission of the local church?
I am reminded of a basic principle that love is determined by the beloved, not the lover. The wife who tells her husband, "I don't think you love me." And he offers a litany of things he does that he perceives as loving. The problem being that she doesn't perceive those same acts as loving. To remedy the problem, the husband must ask his wife, "How can I love you?" In other words, he must do far less communicating and far more listening -- and then respond accordingly.
I wonder is that dynamic exists between congregations and their denominations. Could that explain the thread-like connection between the two? The denomination may think it is supporting the mission of the local church but the local congregation is not feeling that support. The denomination ramps up its communication to convince the congregation that it is supporting her, when the remedy is for the denomination to listen to its congregations. Perhaps it is time for denominational officials to sit down with each congregation and ask, "How can we help you better fulfill your mission?" (An opportunity that has never been afforded the congregations I have served.) And, then, respond accordingly.
Posted in: Five Steps to Denominational Renewal - Part 2
Wendy, I am helped by the distinction between the church gathered (the local church) and the church scattered (individuals living in obedience to Christ in their homes, workplaces, neighborhoods, and world). In this scenario, the scattered Christians are attached to the Church gathered because they serve while under the spiritual authority or covering of the local church. At this very moment, for example, we blog as scattered Christians. If, God forbid, our blog got nasty, our local congregations would/should hold us accountable for our behavior. Granted, such action doesn't happen as often as, perhaps, it should.
Posted in: Five Steps to Denominational Renewal - Part 3
Thanks, Doug, for the suggestion. I don't know first hand, but such experiences may have played a role in the development of groups like ECO and LCMC.
Posted in: Five Steps to Denominational Renewal - Part 2
Bill you are right on. That is the kind of info that would be delivered by regional reps to the headquarters. And the kind of info that would most-likely results in a significant reduction in denominational offices and agencies.
Posted in: Five Steps to Denominational Renewal - Part 2
Thanks for pointing me to Suttle's book. I concur with the mark of faithfulness when understood as faithfulness to join with God in his mission to seek and save the lost by making disciples. But I wonder about the biblical/theological foundation for Suttle's marks of faithfulness: demonstrated growth in the leadership virtues of vulnerability, cooperation, brokenness, patience, and fidelity. How did he come to that list?
Also wondering if you would discount any connection between faithfulness and the number of baptisms/professions of faith?
Posted in: Five Steps to Denominational Renewal - Part 2
Thanks, Doug, for your affirmation of the proposal. And I'll start thinking about part 3
Posted in: Five Steps to Denominational Renewal - Part 1
I wonder if that option was considered?
Posted in: Must Seminaries Change?
Scott, thanks much. And I believe your last comment is right on, as well as this one: "Yet too many seminaries spend far more time making sure that the theology of future preachers is solid than they do helping them communicate all that in vibrant, relevant ways." I look forward to how the Lilly initiative to strengthen preaching impacts CTS. Keep up the good work.
Posted in: Time for Non-Compete Clauses for Clergy?
THanks for feedback, Tim. I can see where my use of the non-compete clause led you to conclude that I was addressing competition between churches. Sorry about that. My point, however, was not about competition and, therefore, I agree with your statement. We all need to keep our eye on the priize and seek first the kingdom.
My concern is with pastors who break their vows/promises and, in the process, divide congregations. (It is hard for me to see God at work in such behavior.) Plus, as you know, the unfortunate fruit of such actions is often divisions which, as Jesus warned, hinder, rather than advance the witness of Christ to the communities they seek to reach.
Posted in: Time for Non-Compete Clauses for Clergy?
Tongue in cheak, for sure.
Posted in: Time for Non-Compete Clauses for Clergy?
But trying to find a way to address a significant problem in the American Protestant Church. How do we encourage pastors to be faithfil to their promises and committed to unity? Perhaps one way is to talk about it. Hence, my post.
Posted in: Time for Non-Compete Clauses for Clergy?
But trying to find a way to address a significant problem in the American Protestant Church. How do we encourage pastors to be faithful to their promises and committed to unity? Perhaps one way is to talk about it. Hence, my post.