Discussion Topic

Over the last 4 months, a team from Home Missions and World Missions worked closely with Calvin Social Resource (CSR) developing a presentation and a survey process to engage stakeholders.

February 17, 2016 0 9 comments

"God loves you and has a wonderful plan for your life." Just what is and is not being said is critical as it appears that we are mixing the concepts of the benevolence of God and his covenant love.

February 3, 2016 0 0 comments

They go by many names: Global Outreach teams, missions councils, missions teams... But the result seems to be the same when a church appoints missions-minded people to promote and direct the church’s role in missions—a more proactive approach to missions. 

February 2, 2016 0 0 comments
Resource, Checklist

Now is a great time to make sure your missions communications are up to date! Here's a handy checklist for a communications audit.

January 20, 2016 1 0 comments

Choose words that convey ownership. They show that your church is playing an active role on the global mission field, not just giving financial support towards one of many causes. 

December 18, 2015 0 0 comments
Resource, Article

Check out this warmly engaging article by Edmund Clowney that sketches out three factors giving fuel to Reformed missions. 

December 15, 2015 0 1 comments

With an increased number of offerings under Faith Promise, people are sensing a more personal connection to their own role in missions, even if it’s on the other side of the world.

December 1, 2015 0 1 comments
Resource, Article

Are you ever frustrated at work? Does it sometimes feel like a waste of time? As leaders, it is worth remembering how Jesus’s presence can transform situations. 

October 12, 2015 0 0 comments
Resource, Article

From the Christian Aid Mission (Oct. 1, 2015) check out this storyof courage in the face of death, and of a man liberated by Jesus who was on a mission to bring death: Christian Workers in Syria Crucified, Beheaded. 

Revelation 12: 7-12

7 Now war arose in heaven, Michael and his...

October 5, 2015 0 0 comments
Resource, Newsletter or Periodical

It’s that time of year again! Missionaries and field staff are making their rounds to supporting churches. How can churches and missionaries open doors for better transparency and benefit?

September 9, 2015 2 0 comments

When a missionary retires, churches face the difficult task of how to use the newly-freed funds. Oftentimes, this decision ends up being made subjectively. Try these questions to make objective decisions. 

September 1, 2015 0 1 comments

During the fall, most churches set aside time to celebrate international missions. Check out these helpful tips to help you get more people involved in your church’s celebration!

August 19, 2015 0 0 comments

Missionary newsletters have been around since Paul. Are they still relevant today?

August 3, 2015 1 7 comments

If summer mission trips are so life changing for the young people, what do those they are going to “serve” get out of it? Might we be using the community for our own transformation?

July 6, 2015 2 1 comments

One thing that has struck me after working for more than a decade to connect churches in the U.S. with churches that World Renew works with overseas is the similarity between them.

July 1, 2015 0 0 comments

As I complete my role as Guide for the Global Missions section, I wish to thank each of you for your collaboration and wisdom. I'd also like to introduce the new Guide...

June 14, 2015 1 2 comments

Time is a powerful enemy to our memories. Which is why God tells us to write his Words on our heads, hearts, and minds. It seems that I haven’t been very diligent in writing down God’s promises.

June 3, 2015 0 0 comments

Learn about Jan Disselkoen's pilgrimage across the Camino de Santiago. Along the way, she is raising money for World Renew and praying for different countries.

May 30, 2015 1 0 comments

While we continue to heed the theological caution of the Reformers as they faced the Islamic faith on the borders of Europe, we need to seek new opportunities to engage with our Muslim neighbors.

May 26, 2015 0 2 comments

Work of the devil? Work of the Triune God? Work of angels? Work of humans? Touchable? Untouchable? Genius in its composition? A disordered work of fiction? These are no new questions for the Christian who would approach the sacred text which Muslims describe as "noble" "unchanged" "final" and "...

May 24, 2015 0 0 comments
Discussion Topic

Not long ago, the leader of a large school of missions said, "We view all missions' practice through the lens of the social sciences." Knowing the context in which this was spoken would tell this observer that:

The social sciences like anthropology and sociology are becoming the main...

May 9, 2015 0 0 comments

On May 24, churches around the world will celebrate Pentecost Sunday. What is the connection between tongues of fire and mission work? Keep reading to find out!

April 29, 2015 1 0 comments

Learn how World Renew & World Missions are responding to the 7.8 magnitude earthquake.

April 27, 2015 1 2 comments

Prizing earthly comfort drives us to selfishness, cowardice, and apathy. When we seek comfort, we fail to trust that God will provide for us even when we personally dislike our circumstances.

April 19, 2015 3 2 comments
Resource, Article

Check out the Youth Ministry section for an interesting and timely series on short term missions!

April 14, 2015 0 0 comments



We will miss you, Abby! We hope you can still give us some guest posts about your experiences this summer.

Abigail, thank you so much for sharing your experience and insight. You've been a blessing to this community and I look forward to "seeing" you around still!  

Thanks Salaam for adding more material from Luther. Very interesting that he was worried about losing people to Islam because they were "disposed to much less splendid errors," and that he advocated fortifying the people with more sturdy arguments.

Thank you Greg for this enlightening article. I think you an I would agree with Luther that it is important to understand Islam. :

       Alongside of your article, I read Sarah Henrich and James L. Boyce, "Martin Luther—Translations of Two Prefaces on Islam: Preface to the Libellus de ritu et moribus Turcorum (1530), and Preface to Bibliander’s Edition of the Qur’an (1543)" in  Word & World , Volume XVI, Number 2, Spring 1996. It can be found on-line.

    These two Lutheran scholars translated two of Luther's works from Latin into English, and I thought they might give your readers a more nuanced view of the fact that Luther was not entirely enamoured with religiosity or papist--and made a critical distinction between someone who worships a generic Creator, and someone who worships the Trinity.   Here are a few excerpts from their document:

[at times I have put the word "Turks" in brackets as that is how he referred to the Muslims of his time]



p. 259 

"Nevertheless, they  [i.e. the Turks] continue to deny and ardently persecute Christ,

p. 260  

.." these evils [i.e. of the Turks] are concealed by such a beautiful, effective, and robust show of ceremonies, good works, and false miracles..... the religion of Christ is something other than ceremonies and customs and that faith in Christ has absolutely nothing to do with discerning what ceremonies, customs, or laws are better or worse, but declares that all of them squeezed together into one mass are not enough for justification nor are they a work for them to perform. Unless we learn this, there is danger that many of our people will become Turks, disposed as they are to much less splendid errors.

p. 261-261

These defenses are the articles about Christ, namely, that Christ is the son of God, that he died for our sins, that he was raised for our life, that justified by faith in him our sins are forgiven and we are saved, etc. These are the thunder that destroys not only Muhammad but even the gates of hell. For Muhammad denies that Christ is the son of God, denies that he died for our sins, denies that he arose for our life, denies that by faith in him our sins are forgiven and we are justified, denies that he will come as judge of the living and the dead (though he does believe in the resurrection of the dead and the day of judgment), denies the Holy Spirit, and denies the gifts of the Spirit. By these and similar articles of faith consciences must be fortified against the ceremonies of Muhammad. With these weapons his Qur’an must be refuted.




p. 264

Muhammad acknowledges, however, that he is devising a new belief that dissents from the prophets and apostles. Therefore, as you firmly repudiate the beliefs of the Egyptians who worshipped cats and of the Arabians who worshipped dogs, so you shall denounce the new creation of Muhammad, because he himself openly admits that he does not embrace the teaching of the prophets and apostles.


p. 264-5

But since this punishment is already in sight, may it warn us, as I have already said, to separate ourselves in prayer from the Turks, from the Jews, and from the other nations, and to invoke the eternal and true God, the creator of all things, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who was crucified for our sake and raised from the dead.


p. 266

The following corollary assertions provide a source of great encouragement: Just as the church of God is eternal, so it is fitting that the church’s teachings be eternal; yet this book witnesses that this creation of Muhammad is a new thing. The church of God by necessity embraces the prophets and apostles; Muhammad rejects their teaching. In the church of God from the very beginning this voice of the gospel has always been handed on: that the eternal Father willed that the Son of God become a sacrifice for sins; Muhammad scorns this sacrifice and propitiation.

Therefore, it is of value for the learned to read the writings of the enemy in order to refute them more keenly, to cut them to pieces and to overturn them, in order that they might be able to bring some to safety, or certainly to fortify our people with more sturdy



Thanks for the information, Julia! 

Apparently, Canadian donations received by Candian charities (World Renew in Canada should qualify) before May 25 and earmarked for the Nepal Relief will be matched 1:1 by the Canadian government.

Kim--Thanks for your comment and pointing out 2 Cor. 12:9--love that verse! So encouraging for us when we face discomfort. 

Thanks so much for sharing this and giving us all something to reflect on. It reminds me of 2 Cor. 12:9.

Aaron--Thanks so much for your thoughts! I'm not sure that I quite understand your comment though--do you mean to say that the effort is there we just aren't doing things effectively?

awesome thoughts. i totally agree with them but i think its been my experience that people are trying to reach young people and not forgetting them. its almost a target demographic i feel that the CRC doesnt know how to reach

Thanks for this helpful resource, Staci! 

"Seeking Allah, Finding Jesus"  by Nabeel Quereshi is a very good book written by a former Muslim who came to Christ in his twenties.  The theological, cultural, family and philosophical struggles he had to go through are well explained and narrated in an easy to read story format.  Even the intellectual knowledge about the poverty of the koran, the contradictions of the prophet Mohammed, and the truth of Jesus, could not initially overcome his reluctance to accept it.  This reluctance was mostly because of the cost... the cost of family relationships, and  the built in fear of eternal death for believing in Jesus as God.  It is a very interesting and revealing book.  

I think Bill we have been living under the auspices of Constantine for 1700 years but that is less and less the case in a post-Christian society. Any advantages that we derived from Christendom are long gone and now we are entering a period where life will be more like the situation Christians faced in the pre-Constantinian environment in the Roman Empire. This will mean a change in thinking about how we approach the world. We will need a lot more humility.


It was a different world when Christianity was considered a Jewish sect by the Roman government. After 70 AD (?) "being" Jewish and/or Christian became a suicide pact. Then things calmed down for awhile until Constantine made Christianity the ruling religion and Judaism, again, became a suicide pact. It took the Jews 1500 years (?) to catch on. Is Christianity becoming a suicide pact? 

Thanks for the post - I think that this is more than a suggestion or a good idea, but is critical to the future of our denomination. We simply must learn to better relate to those who are different than ourselves. Thanks again.

Greetings Harry:

   I purposely put the quote from Accad at the beginning of the article as an introduction to his thinking.

As you read through the article, I show that I actually completely disagree with this line of thinking.

  A large problem with the view of other religions is that more often than not it is anthropocentric, or having humans as the starting point.

Might I refer you to a recent book entitled "For Their Rock is Not as Our Rock" by Daniel Strange.

He shows that any and all religions are at once a quest for God due to a God-shaped vacuum, and at the same time a rejection of God due to the fall causing humans to want to be the sovereign masters of their destiny. 

    Thank you for engaging.

Blessings in Christ


"Your view of Islam will affect your attitude to Muslims. Your attitude will, in turn influence your approach to Christian-Muslim interaction, and that approach will affect the ultimate outcome of your presence as a witness among Muslims."

Let's address this to the two main factions:

Your view of Sunni Muslim will affect your attitude to Shia Muslim. Your attitude will, in turn influence your approach to Sunni-Shia interaction and that approach will affect the ultimate outcome of your presence as witness among ourselves.

Would the template of interaction between Catholics and Protestants be something that could work in the Muslim world?

They need to find a solution to the violence among themselves.

thankyou for your clear thinking and writing on this.  

Along with the team from Strathroy East that you mentioned, quite a few other teams are visiting missionaries in Haiti too. Just reading a few of the missionary blogs, you can see the mutual benefit. 

1. Larry and Tracy Luth enjoyed a fresh perspective on Haiti after becoming accustomed to some of it's unusual sights and sounds.

2. John and Carol Vanderstoep especially appreciated a visit from Maranatha CRC, their sending church.

Thanks so much for that excellent and important question, Fronse! 

Susan Van Lopik is a staff person at World Renew and has multiple years of experience in community development overseas. Susan says,

"Not all communities do need or even want “outsiders”.  It is presumptive of international or local community development practitioners to assume that we can enter any and every community.

Personally I think of the community, its members and structures, to be the real change agents, not outsiders. So I agree with what I think you are suggesting here that the leadership comes from the community.

I do think outsiders can play a role within the community to grow their own vision, to strengthen their organizing, and support their mobilizing which are important ways to support community leadership.

In World Renew’s practice, we work with skilled local partners who are known by the community and who also know the community.

World Renew enters communities by invitation. Often that invitation comes from community leadership through a local partner that is already working in the community, and/or a local church in the community. Working through invitation by the community provides a certain amount of legitimacy for those coming from the outside. That legitimacy can only be maintained as long as the community is fully respected."


Very insightful categorizations for folks considering ministry, mission in other places.

My wife Germaine and I value and are lifted up most knowing people are praying for us.

Good questions. 

Key question, does the community néed/want change agents from outside? If so are the agents aware/knowledgeable about community leadership structures?





Exactly! Asking for support can be incredibly humbling, which is perhaps why it is so difficult. It is also important for donors to have the mindset that their prayers and encouragement can be just as valuable as money, and refraining from donating monetarily should not be frowned up. 

Thanks for sharing!


Thank you for writing about a subject that a growing number of people are doing or preparing to do, i.e., raising support for the work to which God has called or is calling them.

Having done what is commonly called "fundraising" for many years and for various Christian causes, I know that many--and probably most--Christians are acutely uncomfortable with and hesitant to "ask" for financial support. (Even though I have been at it and even guided others along the way, I still get "sweaty palms" before I talk to somebody--often as a "follow up" to a letter I wrote.) I appreciate how you came to understand how important it is to view supporters as the essential partners that they are. It's important for me to remember that asking for support is or should be more about providing someone with an opportunity and invitation to support and participate in God's work than it is about supporting me and my work. Additionally, praying for and trusting God to guide the prospective donor in their decision helps me remember that my primary job is to present the opportunity . . . whether and/or how much someone gives is God's job.

Hi Harry,

Just to be clear, I wasn't aiming to calculate only foreign missions.  Instead I was counting budgeted amounts that go to ministry outside the local neighborhood.  So, that would include budgeted funding for a campus ministry or church plant in some other part of Canada or the US.  I was including Ministry Shares for Home Missions and Back to God as well as World Missions.  I also wasn't taking into account funds raised by offerings that are not budgeted, nor support for local benevolence, Christian education and the like. 

So, looking at the numbers you provided my guess would be that your denominational and classical Ministry Shares are about 40% missions so that would be 7% of your overall budget.  Adding your last category of "Church's own foreign" (8%) and World Renew (5%), I'm thinking your total is about 20%.  I'd say that is excellent.

I'm curious about your focus on travel costs.  They are significant of course, but by far the biggest cost of doing foreign missions are the salaries paid to personnel.  The travel costs are much smaller. 

About 27% of the world's people live in people groups where there are few or no Christians.  In those settings there aren't any indigenous people to do the mission work, of course.  Also, most missionaries do spend a substantial portion of their first term in language study, but we also have people come to us with significant language background before they start, especially Spanish.

posted in: Missions Priority

Hi Steve,

This is an interesting topic and I urge you on to dig deeper into this subject. For immediate feedback here is our church's result:

Ministry Shares /Classis  18%
Salaries                            35%
Local Ministries                17%
Property/Adm.                  12%
World Renew                     5%
Deacons                            4%
Church's own foreign         8%

To get to the total foreign content you need to add WR, WM share of Ministry Shares and the 8% we spend directly what we would call Foreign Missions. About 50%/60% of the amount goes to the Airline companies to get our folks to the local mission field.

I have asked this question before. How much does CRCNA HO (Burlington/Grand Rapids/Chicago) spend on travel in one year by employees of CRCNA who are stationed in these three location (and in Canada and USA) but travel to foreign mission and foreign aid sites?  If you then add to that the cost of transporting Missionaries on their bi-annual or tri-annual leave to their home countries we would get a the real costs of "doing" foreign missions.

Also with the influx of some 1.2 million people per year into North America from all over the world, maybe we should focus "World Missions" on those entering North America! That then becomes local evangelism or Home Missions.

As a general principle the CRCNA should  get to a position of having only indigenous people as missionaries on the ground in foreign fields (immigrants to NA who would be willing to return to their own country would of course qualify).

I believe many governments are now requiring immigrants to be proficient in English (or French for Quebec or other languages for other countries) in order to qualify to enter the country. The same rule should apply to "our" missionaries going to foreign countries.

posted in: Missions Priority

Just to be fair, Jesus used some tactics not highlighted by this article, namely pointing out the woman’s sin [Jn 4.17-18], as well as denigrating her religious tradition [Jn 4.22].

The “dialogue” with others is fun and outright necessary. But eventually, pre-evangelism gives way to evangelism, and a definite truth must be passed from one to another. The Spirit decides whether that truth is received as “an aroma that brings life” or “an aroma that brings death.” [2 Cor 2.16] Let us enjoy pre-evangelistic dialogue, but use it for what it is: an exercise leading up to conveying the absolute, saving message of Christ crucified.

Interesting Greg.  I wonder how many from a Christian background are turning to Islam?  I have a feeling the numbers are large.

Your seventh recommendation is to embrace both truth and love simultaneously... which is good.  But to put it slightly different, without truth, there is no love.  And for the christian, to tell the truth without love, is not christian.

Maybe because it was published at 5 AM over two years ago, I missed this gem of a reflection.  My friend who wrote it should really go to work for a PR firm that specializes in glossing over things and putting on the best face, even while underneath the body suffers.

For us veterans of the - yes, fights - between these "sisters," this article just describes the present because the past has been so sad.  And the lack of real collaboration/coordination/cooperation on so many "fields" (following the lead of the home offices in spite of some very good attempts otherwise) has led to a paucity of results in too many places.  There are not many places where we can point to a thriving church with a holistic ministry where Word and Deed are a natural integral expression of what our theory is.  Why?  Dual agencies/administrations by nature replicate dual structures.  

In a couple of Central American countries the national Christian Reformed churches have practically no working relationship with the new model of going with NGOs as the preferred expression of the CRCNA there.  Please give a critical re-read of the paragraph "Do CRWM and World Renew work together?"  We are not surprisingly replicating our grand mistake of  allowing the divorce of 50 years ago to go on and on.  And my sense of things is that the boomerang of ecclesiastical history has come home to debilitate our whole bi-national denomination, as evidenced by the malaise and decline so lamented by many of us who did what we could to do it differently. 

thanks, Abigail, for this work with old colleagues!   I was one of those writers of dusty letters back in the late 80s,(yes they seemed dusty even while I wrote), and I remember that the fax was a new hi-tech development over there in Asia.Nobody dreamed of such a thing as email.  I really enjoyed reading your reflections on the boxes of correspondence.  

Abby, this is beautiful! Thank you for ensuring that these voices will not disappear.

Greetings Greg:

   As I read your post, I see that you are doing something that the Apostle Paul did as he "carefully observed" the practices of the Athenians in Acts 17. Careful observation is hugely important, and careful observation will lead to questions. As I carefully observed your post, I noticed a few things.

1. You seem to insinuate that a mosque is the Islamic equivalent of a church and an imam is the Islamic equivalent of a seminary grad. From an Islamic point of view, this is questionable. If you read the description of a mosque from the hugely influential Muslim named Yusuf Al-Qaradawi in his 2006 fatwa:

<<<<The mosque at the time of the Messenger of Allah [Muhammad] was the center of the activities of the Muslim community as a whole: it was not just a house of worship and prayer, but included worship, a university for science, a forum for literature, and a parliament for consultation ... it was used by delegations from various places in the Arabian peninsula to meet with the prophet [Muhammad], and it was the place where he gave his sermons and guidance in all religious, social and political aspects of life.

In the life of the prophet there was no distinction between what the people call sacred and secular, or religion and politics: he had no place other than the mosque for politics and other related issues. That established a precedent for his religion. The mosque at the time of the prophet was his propagation center and the headquarters of the state.

This was also the case for his successors, the rightly guided Caliphs: the mosque was their base for all activities political as well as non-political.

... Politics as a science is one of the best disciplines, and as a practice and career it is the most honorable. The surprising thing is that it is politicians, who are totally immersed in it [politics] from the top of their heads to the soles of their feet, who are inquiring if the mosque should embark on and leap into political affairs. Politics in itself is neither vice, nor evil, according to Islam. ... For Muslims it is part of our religion: doctrine and worship constitute a system for the whole of life. 

... It must be the role of the mosque to guide the public policy of a nation, raise awareness of critical issues, and reveal its enemies. 

From ancient times the mosque has had a role in urging jihad for the sake of Allah, resisting the enemies of the religion who are invading occupiers. That blessed Intifada in the land of the prophets, Palestine, started from none other than the mosques.  Its first call came from the minarets and it was first known as the mosque revolution. The mosque's role in the Afghan jihad, and in every Islamic jihad cannot be denied.>>>>

      So what is the bottom line here? The mosque is essentially the "mini-headquarters of a political-religious state" for the advancement of Islam in a given geographical area. This view is also stated by Sheikh Omar Bakri, principal lecturer of the London School of Shari’ah he lists in order the following functions of a mosque.

1. the headquarters of the Islamic State's supreme leadership

2. a section of the Department of Information and Culture

3. a Judiciary Court

4. a University for Learning and Teaching

5. a platform for oratory, eloquence and poetry

6. a place where war booties are divided

7. a detention centre for the prisoner of war

     If I have not persuaded you yet, the book The Mosque Exposed, by two former Muslims, Sam Solomon and E. Alamaqdisi will attest to the above. 

    Greg, your making "careful observation" in your honourable quest to be a good neighbour might need a bit of "careful observation."

2. Your title: Since you mention love and terrorism I wonder if you could ask your imam dialogue partner a couple of questions.

a. What does he think of the Qur'anic injunction to "prepare" in Qur'an 8:60 and its relation to terror..

b.  I also wonder what he thinks about Brigadier Malik's book "The Quranic Concept of War" with its bottom line "

Terror struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only
a means, it is the end in itself. Once a condition of terror into
the opponent's heart is obtained, hardly anything is left to be
achieved. It is the point where the means and the end meet
and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon
the enemy; it is the decision we. wish to impose upon him.  p.59

c. Does he see any connecting lines between the "time of terrorism" that you refer to and any kind of primary source documents?. 








Great observation. All to often we place the emphasis on the verb GO. Indeed the important point is to MAKE. Of course we do not make disciples by ourselves. That would certainly scare us. But we must be in the world and constantly ready to share the hope that is within us.

Bonnie, you are correct in that translation of the verb "to go" in Matthew 28:19. It's a participle that more describes how you are to make disciples rather than just going. It's a lifestyle rather than a sometime thing. 

Great points!  For some of us, its too bad we were not encouraged nor taught how to do that from the time we were children.  Never too late to start.

I am not a Greek scholar - but I once heard a pastor say that "Go and make disciples... would be better translated, "as you are going, make disciples ... " That makes sense to me, it's every Christian's calling.


Thanks for your comment. I totally agree with supporting missionaries at home and abroad, especially now that they must do a lot more fundraising. The problem is that there are many who are more complacent to just give to missionaries than be one as well thinking they've met their responsibility which they are called to. Missionaries need our support and I gladly give to their work wherever I can both in money and in time. I think the word used now is "glocal"--be both globally and locally focused in missions. Hmmm... that might be my next blog post.

Hi Joshua,

I agree one hundred percent that the mission field is all around us and that we are to invite people into the kingdom - and live in a winsome way that draws them in. That is what Salaam Project is all about. But CR World Missions has survived for 125 years because people were also willing to give of their hard earned income and many have heard the Gospel because of it. So I would say yes, reach out to your neighbor locally, but if you feel called to support your missionaries through prayer and finances - go for it. Thanks for blogging.


Grove City is a nice place, and the college a good one.  (we have relatives there).  Enjoy, and blessings.

Abby,  Thanks for your work this summer. You did a marvelous job for the Global Mission Network page.  Steve

I've appreciated your articles, Abigail and hope to read more from you in the future! Many blessings in your studies this year.

Thanks for your good work. And for your enthusiasm about The Network site in general.

Yes, thank you Abigail. I look forward to working with you in the future.

Thank you, Abby! We have enjoyed having you in our office and look forward to your continuing service.

Thank you Greg for your exposition of Sharia law and the contrast with the law written on human hearts by the Holy Spirit and accomplished by His power.. Your points of explanation are helpful yet could be mis-interpreted quite easily.

For instance, it is important to stress that Muslims believe that they uniquely are "rightly guided." Yet the reality is that Biblically speaking, they are actually not. Biblically speaking they are in darkness.

The daily prayer called the al-Fatiah prayer prayed by Muslims asks that they stay on the right path--which is essentially what the Sharia is.  However, what you might easily have overlooked is that the assumption by Muslims is that theirs is the right path which insures blessings--and again Biblically speaking this is not so.

Rather the al-Fatiah prayer {Surah 1:6-7) reads اهدِنَــــا الصِّرَاطَ المُستَقِيمَ

Ihdinā ṣ-ṣirāṭa al-mustaqīm [English=Guide us to the Straight Path.
 صِرَاطَ الَّذِينَ أَنعَمتَ عَلَيهِمْ غَيرِ المَغضُوبِ عَلَيهِمْ وَلاَ الضَّالِّين Ṣirāṭa al-lathīna anʿamta ʿalayhim ġayri l-maġhḍūbi ʿalayhim walā ḍ-ḍāllīn [English =The path of those upon whom You have bestowed Your blessings, those whose (portion) is not wrath, nor of those who have gone astray.]

The classical Muslim exegete Ibn Kathir stated that those whose portion is wrath are the Jews, and those who have "gone astray" are the Christians. 

Thus the essential prayer which stands behind Sharia law, is a daily appeal not be be a Jew or a Christian.

Might it be an idea to look at the assumptions behind such Islamic ideas as the Sharia for the benefit of your readers?. Otherwise you might be saying far too little, and open yourself to the charge of being a witting or unwitting apologist for Islam.




Thank you for all your comments. I am surprised that there aren't more but it is the summer.

First, let me reply to Joe. I read a lot of current affairs that use CE. I do not mean to make any theological statements by that.

Now to Harry. I am deeply distressed by events in Nigeria and the Middle East. We do need to be in prayer for our Christian brothers and sisters who are persecuted, forced to flee from their homes, traumatized. I realize that is is nearly impossible for Christians to live under IS. But I continue to believe that we should not judge all Muslims by these extremist groups, and in fact many Muslim leaders have denounced IS, Boko Haram and other groups using violent tactics that target minorities. We have to remember that much of the current violence is Muslim vs Muslim, not Muslim vs Christian. Before the current events in Syria, Muslims and Christians co-existed well - I know that from a Syrian Christian. My intent in this post was to compare Christianity to Islam, to help us understand why Sharia is important to Muslims and to show that in Christianity we have gone a completely different route - looking to the guidance of a living God and his Spirit rather than a codified law to guide us. In this the Anabaptist missionary and scholar Dr. David Shenk is my guide. His peace building focus is one that I hope we can all adopt.

Harry & Joe,

Greg works as the Project Manager for the Salaam Project, an initiative committed to learning how to better love Muslims in the name of Christ. This project takes God's call to love our neighbor very seriously--regardless of whether our neighbor shares our faith. Further, Jesus did not reserve his love only for the "good" people, in fact he often sought out the most wretched of sinners. We should absolutely be outraged and devastated about the violence in Syria, Iraq, and Nigeria taken credit for by Muslims, but that does not mean we should refrain from loving our Muslim neighbors. This may make them all the more difficult to love, but I also believe this then makes the Salaam Project all the more important.   

As Christians we ultimately desire that our Muslim neighbors will find the peace, joy, and hope that we have in Jesus, but we also take Paul's words in 1 Corinthians 13 to heart, "the greatest of these is love" and understand that as Christians we must "love as he first loved us" (1 John 4:19).

Greg sheds light on parts of Islam that can help us to better understand our Muslim neighbors, especially when it is often difficult to comprehend their actions. However, he also points out in his closing that Christians have the Holy Spirit to guide us, which Islam lacks. How grateful we can be for a God who lives in our hearts and convicts us!   

Greg Sinclair seems so intent to get along with other faiths that he readily casts aside the traditional AD (Latin for Year of Our Lord) to refer to the destruction of the Jewish temple as 70 CE (common era). I wouldn't be surprised if Sinclair refers to the birth of Jesus simply as Xmas.     

I get the impression you are an apologist for the Muslim Faith. Until I see Muslim leaders as a group distance themselves publicly from the events of those 250 girls in Nigeria and from the establishment of a caliphate in Syria and Iraq which minces no words about their objectives, I fail to see the relevance of what you and the CRCNA are trying to do. 

I would refer you to the latest news letters from MERF as to the events in the Middle East.