Connection?

  200 views

Back in the tumultuous 90s a pastor in the Classis I was then part of started musing about the possibility of the whole Classis leaving the Christian Reformed Church. This might have just been a stray remark, the conversation certainly didn’t go anywhere, but it still unsettled me. As I reflected on that I realized that this was not just because I had different views than the pastor who voiced the subject of secession. My discomfort also came because my relationship to Classis was different from my relationship with other ecclesiastical bodies.

I had an attachment to the congregation I was serving at the time. In the typically complicated relationship a pastor has to a congregation it was both the body that employed me and the body that welcomed my family into its fellowship. My children were born into that church and I had lived in that community longer than I had lived in any other place since I had been eleven years old.

That last fact also partly explains why my attachment to the Christian Reformed Church rests on something deeper than the fact that “Responsibility” is one of my five Strength Finder "signature themes.” In a somewhat peripatetic youth spent in three different countries, I’d been a member of different Christian Reformed Churches, had hung out with Christian Reformed missionaries, gone to Christian Reformed sponsored schools, and played in a Christian Reformed hockey league (yes I really did say hockey league).  In short, the Christian Reformed Church was always there.

Classis, on the other hand, was a meeting that I attended a couple of times a year. My relationship to Classis was administrative, not personal.

I wonder whether this might help explain the challenges of classical renewal. Though we might agree that Classis does not often function at it's highest potential--though we might believe that Classis is in a better position to support local congregations than other institutions--we are trying to renew an institution that people only have a passing and not very personal relationship with. Very few people see themselves as members of a Classis. We need to take that into account when trying to make Classis better.

Posted in:
Image Credit

The Network hosts user-submitted content.
Posts don't necessarily imply CRCNA endorsement, but must comply with our community guidelines.

Let's Discuss…

We love your comments! Thanks for your help upholding the Community Guidelines to make this an encouraging and respectful community for everyone.

Norman;   Could it be that the feeling of malaise that comes over many members when the word "Classis" is mentioned has it origins in the growing detachment Christians appear to have toward "Christendom" along with  its requisite structure?

Blaise Pascal* said "We know the truth not only through our reason but also through our heart.  It is through the latter that we know first principles, and reason, which has nothing to do with it, tries in vain to refute them."   Could it be that  'first principles' betimes get overlooked not just in Classis but in congregations too?

Malcolm Muggeridge addressed the subject of  Christendom in two lectures he gave at the University of Waterloo (UW) in Ontario in October of 1978.  (The Pascal Lectures).   His topic was "The End of Christendom", (but not of Christ). As he explained, " Christendom is something quite different from Christianity,(the former)  being the administrative or power structure, based on the Christian religion and constructed by men,  It's founder was Emperor Constantine whereas the founder of Christianity was of course Christ".

In his introductory remarks, John North who was then President of UW said:  "Most of the great universities of the West were founded with the conviction that theology is the queen of the disciplines, and that the key to man's wholeness is the pursuit of the truth through Jesus Christ.  Apart from that truth, it was believed,  all other expressions of truth are fragmentary and sterile"  .

If refocusing is required by either Classis or Congregations,  the Muggeridge lectures are well worth reviewing, at least in my opinion.  It is possible the two lectures could be retrieved in their entirety from the archives of the publisher, Wm B Erdmans (1980).

Sincerely,

Ed Tigchelaar

*Pensee 110