Aaron Vriesman
Born, baptized, raised, married, confirmed and ordained in the Christian Reformed Church. From the Muskegon, Michigan area. Graduated from Calvin College in 2001. M.Div from Western Theological Seminary in 2004. Ordained in January of 2006. Serving as solo pastor at North Blendon Christian Reformed Church.
Posted in: Classes that Won't Seat Women
Antonio,
you say "The Apostle Saint Paul is a "man of his time period" a male centered Jewish culture..." but your statement about in Christ there is neither male or female comes from the same man of the same time period. I'm curious as to how these two statements can fit together. Care to revise, or am I missing something?
Posted in: Classes that Won't Seat Women
Antonio,
Your post is most puzzling to me. Are you saying that Jesus was not a revolutionary in any way at all?
Posted in: Classes that Won't Seat Women
Paul,
Forgive me if this has been addressed somewhere already but I have a question about what you are writing here. Do you believe that the complementarian view is based on culture? If the reason women officebearers are not forced upon all classes is because of differing cultures, then does that imply complementarians are complementarian because of their culture? It seems that the more these differing views are seen as cultural, the more it can be said that complementarians are just prejudiced and misogynistic.
Posted in: Classes that Won't Seat Women
Antonio,
I'm not an expert on Pauline literature to understand his real or perceived discrepancies. The statements you post are problematic and untenable however. For example, claiming that Paul contradicts himself implies that the Bible contradicts itself, which then implies that the Bible is untrustworthy since it says one thing and then the opposite. These claims, if pressed, lead to a position where we as fallible humans decide which verses of the Bible are valid/correct/inspiried and which are "Paul being his contradictory self."
Posted in: Classes that Won't Seat Women
Dawn,
Do you believe that the CRC, with two equally valid positions on women in office, can indeed move forward in a productive way without either side eventually compromising or caving in?
Posted in: Classes that Won't Seat Women
Antonio,
If "Jesus" was not a revolutionary but "Christ" was indeed a revolutionary, then you must be talking about two different persons in such a way that Jesus Christ had a split-personality disorder. This is a denial of the Ecumenical Creeds, which the CRC stands on.
Posted in: Classes that Won't Seat Women
Exactly!
I can name quite a few women who wouldn't want to be included as you say.
Rights and power seem to be everything in mainstream culture and unfortunately in the church.
Posted in: The Geek in the Pew
Nice Josh!
Posted in: The Geek in the Pew
No special strategy from me. Just the general showing interest in people, asking them questions about what they are interested in, letting them talk about what excites them most.
Posted in: Delegates by the Numbers
I agree with John:
"Relating everything to color is very primitive way of evaluating anything, and a sad commentary on our perception of diversity"
I can see the motive of wanting a good cross section of the denominational makeup to be represented at synod. However, it seems that this motive of diversity is based on mere appearances. True diversity entails pursuing God through Jesus Christ, in whom there is neither Jew nor Greek, barbarian or Scythian (Gal. 3:26; Col. 3:11). It appears as though some are simply pursuing diversity in appearance alone, which Scripture describes as contrary to the policy of God himself, who does not show favoritism based on race or appearances of any kind (Ac. 10:34; Rom. 2:11, 10:12; Gal. 2:6). Rather, it is we humans who judge people by external appearances (1Sam. 16:7, John 7:24). In this way, making a qualification of the color of flesh is symptomatic of the flesh as opposed to the Spirit. Leadership of the church is to be made on the content of a person’s character (Ac. 1:24), not the color of skin, even as Martin Luther King once stated so well.
Perhaps someone can help me understand the obsession with diversity of appearance.