Skip to main content

An article reviewing President Barak Obama's remarks about mental health in a speech made on June 3, 2013, says, "The president also pointed out that persons with mental illnesses statistically are far more likely to be the victims of violence than the perpetrators, and the vast majority of gun violence in America is not linked to people with mental problems. 'I want to be absolutely clear the overwhelming majority of people who suffer from mental illnesses are not violent,' he declared."

Tyl,

Thanks for your comments. A couple thoughts in response:

1. Eiesland's (and my) point is that Jesus bore the marks of his wounds in his glorified body. After his resurrection Jesus had a glorified body which was more unlike than like his body before his suffering and death, so unlike that his disciples did not even recognize him. I believe that we can assume that the same will be true for all who live with glorified bodies in the new heaven and earth. And I believe that we will bear the marks of our lives while here on earth. We will have new identities in Christ, and those identities will not be completely separated from who we were while here on earth. We will be transformed, but we will not be annihilated and turned into something completely different than what we were on earth. Will you see colors in heaven? Like you, I expect that you will, and you will bear the marks of your color-blindness in the new heaven and earth; you'll carry with you a wisdom and insight from living with color blindness now that will enrich your life in the new heaven and earth. Bev's comment last week about living with a deformed hand makes this point much better than I can.

2. The value in speculating about life in the new heaven and earth is to change our behavior and attitudes today. Raising this topic helps us think about the nature of disability, identity, and the value of people today. If it is true that people will bear the marks of their disability throughout eternity, as Jesus bears the marks of his suffering, then it means that God places a high value on our experiences while here on earth, and he values the people having those experiences. Too often, people with disabilities feel as if other people discount them and the contributions they make to life and society. But that's not God's perspective. If we said that God annihilated people and started all over, then who we are on this earth doesn't really matter. But if God values people so much that we bear the marks of this life in the next, then we and our experiences are valuable right now because God values people and their experiences and the wisdom gained through that experience including disabilities and the people who live with them.

Blessings, Mark

Tyl,

Thanks for this discussion. It's good to think carefully about this, and your insights help.

As I said in my comment above, I assume you will see colors in the age to come. Your and my longings are the same. As I wrote in my first blog about my daughter Nicole who lives with severe multiple disabilities today, "Of all the things I long for in the new heaven and earth one of the deepest is this: to see Nicole come running up to me, and say, 'Hi dad, let’s talk.'" Furthermore, I long for the time when I can have a clear-headed discussion with my mom once again; that's impossible now because she lives with severe dementia.

From the little the Bible says, the new heavens and earth will be familiar to us, yet will be dramatically better. Likewise, our identities, which God has shaped while here on earth, will be ours in the new heaven and earth, and those identities will be made new in Christ. Somehow, in the age to come, God will embrace and affirm all that Nicole and my mom are in this age, AND he will make them wonderfully new. To say it another way, in the age to come, we will all "bear the marks" of our lives in this age, and we will be renewed.

I agree with you that the followers of Jesus did recognize him, but the Scriptures seem to indicate that they needed something from the past to recognize him in his resurrected body. With the disciples (Luke 24) it was in the marks of his crucifixion, with Mary Magdalene his voice, and with the couple on the way to Emmaus in the breaking of the bread. Once again, it seems that the age to come will somehow embrace all of this age, and it will be wonderfully different and better as well.

Your question about Jesus showing the disciples his side (John 20) is a good one, and the Scriptures indicate that his piercing is a significant part of his identity (even though it happened after his death), so that he bears that mark in his resurrected body. Isaiah 53 and Zechariah 12 prophesy his piercing, and the apostle John makes sure to show how scripture was fulfilled. I assume that for the rest of us, what happens to our bodies after we die will not be part of our identity in the new heavens and earth.

I mentioned one application to you of value in this discussion, namely, to affirm the value of the lives of people with disabilities today. As I have been thinking about your comments, I think of a second application as well: how pastors conduct funerals of people who had disabilities when they died. When someone dies who did not live with disabilities, pastors usually focus on all the positive aspects of their lives. But when someone with a disability dies, pastors often focus on how they will be made new and different and better in heaven, using words like "freed" and "released" and "made whole." The danger with this emphasis is that it implies that people are better dead than disabled. (See Ben Mattlin's commentary for a pointed illustration.) That's the message of Peter Singer and his ilk, as well as the whole "right to die" movement, but not one that we Christians would want to communicate. Not at funerals or anywhere else. Each life is precious in this age and the age to come, and we Christians need to affirm that truth everywhere, perhaps especially at funerals.

Peace to you too,

Mark

Mark Stephenson on November 8, 2011

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

John, thanks for your comment and this opportunity to clarify. I'm not suggesting that Jesus does not heal, nor am I saying that the new life we will have with our resurrected bodies won't be unspeakably wonderful. My concern is with Lucado's handling of these themes with regard to people with disabilities. In my opinion, in his attempt to foster hope for the future he diminishes people in the present. I'm especially concerned with his implication that people with disabilities are somehow automatically less Christlike because they have a disability. This may not be his intent, however, people with disabilities frequently endure subtle and overt suggestions that their disability is a punishment for their lack of faith or for some sin in their lives. For example, my wife and I were told once that our daughter lives with severe disabilities because we don't have enough faith. This devotion by Lucado plays right into the wrong-headed and unscriptural teaching that people with disabilities are less Christian than people who do not have disabilities.

Mike, yes, I think that's exactly the point of the article. SSDI does help many people, but many factors stand in the way of it being an even better law such as these:

1. The law itself discourages people who could be employed, at least part time, because the law prohibits them from working much if they get SSDI.

2. As you point out, many employers won't consider applicants who have disabilities because they fear cost for accommodations and higher health care costs, and the employers can't imagine how the applicant could do the job. Yet, costs have been shown not to go up much for employers who do hire people with disabilities, and many people with disabilities have found creative ways to get things done that us temporarily able bodied people can't imagine.

So both the law and our attitudes need to change.

Mark Stephenson on May 16, 2011

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

Tyl,

The give and take of this confirmation helps me to clarify my own ideas. Thank you for sticking with it. (To avoid repeating the same phrase over and over, I'll use "the age to come," "the life to come," and "the new heavens and earth" as synonyms.)

I'll try to explain again what I mean by "bear the marks of one's disability." I assume that God is a God of economy. None of our experiences gets wasted. Instead our experiences conform us more to the image of Christ. The image of Christ is so big and broad, that no human can do so by him or herself. But we bring our own unique gifts to the body of Christ both in this life and in the life to come. As we listen to each other and value each other and value the unique gifts and perspectives that each member of Christ's body brings to the body of Christ, then the body of Christ becomes more complete, more whole, while here on this earth. But that is only the beginning of the process; the real completion and wholeness will come about in the life to come.

So for example, my daughter is a part of the body of Christ now, and she brings a unique contribution to the healthy functioning of the body that would not be there without her. I do believe that she will walk and speak in the new heavens and earth, but I would not want to say that she will be made "whole" in the age to come, unless we also use that same language about all of us who are members of Christ's body. Rather than say that Nicole will be made whole in the age to come, I would rather say that she makes the body of Christ more whole in this age, and she will make the body of Christ more whole in the age to come. She brings a unique perspective and gifts and presence to the body of Christ as she is today. Her unique perspective and set of gifts and presence comes to the body of Christ now because Nicole is as she is, not in spite of her disabilities but through her disabilities. (God is a God of economy.) And I believe God works in her life now and will do so after her death so that her unique perspective and gifts and presence will be brought into the age to come as well. And that's what I think of when I say that she will bear the marks of her disability in the age to come.

Mark

Mark Stephenson on May 19, 2011

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

Ben,

Yes, as Scripture teaches, our new bodies will be "sprouted" from the seeds of who we were while here on earth. And who we will be will be absolutely wonderful and made new. However, when you say, "But the new being will be so different as to be almost unrecognizable," do you mean that we will be almost unrecognizable to ourselves? Do you mean that I will lose my current identity as a male, as the husband of Bev while here on earth (though of course not married to her in heaven), as the father of our children, as one who buried one of our children and raised another who has severe disabilities? I hope not, because these are a few of the facts of genetics and of experience that God is using to make me more Christlike. I will be forever indebted to my wife for the ways that she has been helping me grow in Christlikeness, and I hope that I can carry that appreciation throughout eternity. I firmly believe that these will be part of my identity in the new heavens and earth, sprouts from which the new me will grow. I don't see anything in Scripture that suggests that I will lose all that God is making me now. I will "bear the marks" of my life in this age when I am made new in the age to come. Likewise, with all of his children, including his children who live with disabilities. We will bear the marks of our lives in this age when he makes us new in the age to come. It seems like it would be wasteful of God to throw out all that he has been making us in this age when he ushers in the age to come.

What will our "scars" look like in the age to come? They'll be beautiful. You mention the saint who was sawn in two for her faith. The scars that she will bear from her martyr's death in the new heavens and earth will add to her beauty, like the pearl in the oyster. All those ways in which God has been shaping and forming his children while here on earth will add to the beauty and richness of heaven, we'll bear these marks throughout eternity. But I certainly don't believe that we'll stop growing and that the new heavens and earth will be a static existence. We'll keep on growing in relationship with God and his people and creation. The few years we spend here on earth will be part of us in heaven, but an increasingly smaller part as we live with Christ and his people in the new creation for eternity.

Mark

Mark Stephenson on November 9, 2011

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

John, Yes, Jesus was very clear that disabilities are not punishment for sin. But most Christians throughout church history have ignored that fact. You wrote, "I very much doubt that Lucado is suggesting that a person's sin, or lack of faith is the cause of his sickness or disability.   Do you seriously  think that  he would  be thinking that they are less Christian or less Christ-like?" Not only do I agree with you, I said the same thing, starting in the title of the blog. My point is not Lucado's intent, it's his delivery. When people get subjected repeatedly to patronizing and discriminatory comments and actions, they want it to stop. In the same way that a white person who speaks and writes about racism must bear in mind a long history of words and actions that have hurt people of color, so a nondisabled person who speaks and writes about disability must bear in mind a long history of words and actions that have hurt people with disabilities. Whether one is dealing with racism or ableism, good intentions are a good start, but they must be followed by speech and writing and action that back up those good intentions, not undercut them.

Jonny, thanks so much for the compliment. I believe firmly that our language can communicate respect or disrespect, and that means listening to how people would like to have others refer to them and respecting their preferences. So yes, the golden rule is at the heart of this post. I hope you find other helpful resources on our pages too. Here's what we're about: Disability Concerns helps churches become healthier communities that embody the whole body of Christ. Thanks for making my day and God's blessings. Mark

Tyl and Ben,

Good questions which have me searching the scriptures to better understand why I believe we will maintain our earthly identities in the age to come:

1 Samuel 28: When Saul consulted the spirit of Samuel, Saul spoke with Samuel whose body had died. His identity was maintained after death.

Luke 23: Jesus told the thief on the cross, “Today you will be with me in paradise.” Jesus refers to him as “you”, implying that the you on this earth was maintained after the thief died.

Luke 24: Jesus was still Jesus after his death and resurrection, and he bore in his glorified body the marks of his suffering.

Revelation 7: The great multitude standing before the Lamb was people “from every nation, tribe, people and language.” They maintained their identities as they were also joined together into one body in Christ.

And one reference from the Heidelberg Catechism, Q&A 49 which says, “How does Christ’s ascension into heaven benefit us? . . . we have our own flesh in heaven – a guarantee that Christ our head will take us, his members, to himself in heaven.” Christ’s flesh, bearing the marks of his suffering, is now in heaven, so I believe that we too who are his children will bear the marks of our own earthly lives, including our sufferings, in the age to come because we will maintain our identities. Even the greatest challenges that we face on this earth, I believe, will be part of who we are in the age to come, because God uses our experiences to shape us to become more Christ-like.

As Tyl says, we have to make a lot of assumptions because Scripture doesn’t say much at all about heaven or the age to come except that the whole creation will be renewed including we ourselves. Just how we will bear the marks of our earthly lives in the age to come is something we can only guess at, which is what we have been doing in this dialogue. We don’t know the answers to most questions we have raised. I apologize that some of the statements I made sounded as if I were sure when in reality I have been guessing.

We keep on raising more good questions for which there are no clear answers. Will conjoined twins on this earth be conjoined in the age to come? Will we remember sin and its effects? Will we remember (and grieve) those who aren’t there? How will the fact that my mother lived the final years of her life with dementia affect her life in the age to come? What will our new lives in Christ be? Will we know how people died (in some cases martyr’s deaths)?

Here are couple things that Scripture does teach clearly.

Matthew 22: Scripture clearly teaches that we will not be married to those who were our spouses on earth.

1 Corinthians 15: Death will be vanquished, and all who are in Christ will rise from the dead with immortal bodies.

In thinking about our discussion, I think that we would agree that we will maintain our identities in the age to come. I’ve given a few Scripture passages to back up that assumption. It seems that our disagreements have rested on just what of our identities will be carried over from this age to the next.

Beyond that, we can’t say much, except as Tyl says so well, “I am convinced that it's going to be a lot better than we can even assume (how's that for using "convinced" and "assume" in one sentence!).” Amen to that!

 

Mark Stephenson on November 9, 2011

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

John, I'm sure we are very close in our thinking. Obviously, you care a great deal about the people in your life, including people with disabilities, and see them as the image-bearers of God that they are. You see the person first, as I also try to do. Regarding language, on the one hand, if we get too uptight about what we say, we'll never be able to talk about any controversial subject at all. But If we speak or write without regard to the feelings of hearers or readers, then we show disrespect, even if the disrespect is unintentional. Let's say that a company division just got a new manager, fresh with her MBA out of prestigious business school. Without getting to the know the people or the culture of that division, she immediately implements a variety of changes in the way her division works. She hasn't taken the time to listen first and build trust and respect before implementing changes. Thus, she communicates disrespect. Similarly, if someone is going to write or speak about disability, he needs to listen to some people who live with disabilities and listen to what others are saying and writing about it before diving in, otherwise, unintentionally, he communicates disrespect because he has not listened to the collective experience of others. That's my sense of what happened with this particular devotional by Lucado. Once again, he's a great writer and pastor and has done many people good through his work. But we all make mistakes. I wrote about this devotional as a teaching tool to remind all of us who speak and write that we are held to a higher standard, and we must take care, lest our words have the opposite effect of what they intend.

We want to hear from you.

Connect to The Network and add your own question, blog, resource, or job.

Add Your Post