Skip to main content

Mark Stephenson on August 21, 2013

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

Yes, I'm sure you do miss her, as do all of us who knew her well. It's been 5 months since her death, and I can still hardly believe that she won't pop in my office door some Monday morning, as she often did, to chat.

Posted in: I Am Exceptional

Jocelyn and Stanley, yes, I think the point of the article is that every one of us is exceptional, and Rod has expressed that very well. Mark

Speaking of humor, a colleague mentioned to me today about the new symbol (isn't it great that people are talking about it?!) that the symbol would have even more impact if there were a road kill squirrel behind the wheelchair user who (by mistake of course) killed the squirrel as the user raced along in that chair!

Considering that we in the U.S. are dependent on the rest of the world, we need to be in discussion with the rest of the world. Our clothing comes from all over the world. Our oil comes from Saudi Arabia, Russia, and lots of other countries. We owe a lot of our money to China, and that massive debt was building long before the current president. Much of the stuff we buy in stores was made in China, Mexico, Canada, and India. Our software was written by people in various regions of the world. I assume that no automobile on the road today has all of its parts and software completely designed and built in the U.S. The bargains we search for during this buying season come thanks to the work of people all across the globe. The world financial system is one massive, global web. On top of all that, the more that other nations are in chaos, the more likely they will breed terrorists who often direct their hatred toward the U.S. The U.N. is surely not perfect, but it is a forum for dialogue. Considering our worldwide interdependence, we need that dialogue. Yes, U.N. treaties are unenforceable, but I wouldn't want it any other way. I wouldn't want the U.N. to have a police force and army that could enforce treaties across the globe. The value of the U.N.'s disability treaty is that it calls the rest of the world to work toward the standards that we have in U.S. law already.

Mark Stephenson on December 12, 2012

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

A comment on process: The Network is for thoughtful Christian dialogue as we walk in the footsteps of Christ together. Respectful disagreement is appropriate, but name-calling (thugs) is not.

Posted in: Diagnosing Evil

On Disability Concerns Facebook page, one person asked how talking about mental illness stigmatizes it. I responded to her that open discussions about mental illness do not stigmatize, but the media tend to associate mental illness with crimes and atrocities, that stigmatizes. This article by Nirvi Shah in Education Week, Conn. School Shootings Unleashed Attack on Disabilities, Too, articulates this point much better than I can.

Posted in: Diagnosing Evil

I just read another fine article on this subject by the director of a county community mental health agency: A call to fund mental health treatment. The author, Michael Brashears, argues BOTH that a history of mental illness is not a predictor of violent behavior AND that communities that fund treatment programs for people dealing with mental illnesses show that they consider these individuals to be valued and contributing members of their communities.

Mark Stephenson on December 3, 2012

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

John, thanks for your note. Many people (I WAS among them) say that "handicap" should be avoided because it comes from an old British term for beggars who approached people with cap in hand. I learned recently from Snopes, that this etymology of "handicap" is incorrect. Some people distinguish "handicap" from "disability" by saying that "handicap" describes environmental and attitudinal barriers that keep people with disabilities from fully participating in society, while "disability" describes a functional limitation that someone lives with due to a intellectual, emotional, physical, or sensory impairment. Nearly all the literature I read that has come out in the last 10 years, writers eschew the word "handicap", but I'm not really sure why. Yes, the word "disability" may fall into disfavor someday too, but right now it is the most common term.
 

Mark Stephenson on December 3, 2012

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

Yes, we have no ability on our own to earn our way into God's favor, and one could call that our greatest disability, shared by all humankind. However, I don't every use the term "disabilty" to describe our sin for a reason. Many people with disabilities have been rubbed raw by the association many people make between their disabilty and human sinfulness. Sometimes the connection is very direct. For example, one time a woman told me that my daughter lives with severe, multiple disabilities because my wife and I don't have enough faith that God can cure her of these disabilities. Besides this painfully common accusation, many people with disabilities are told or assumed to have done something really bad to deserve the disability they live with. In fact, the word "monster" (which comes from the Latin verb "monere" which means "to warn") first was used to refer to people with visible disabilities. They were warnings to the rest of society that if you violate the will of the gods, you will experience their wrath.

I'm sure that you had none of this in mind in what you wrote, but for these reasons I prefer never to associate "disability" with sin.

We want to hear from you.

Connect to The Network and add your own question, blog, resource, or job.

Add Your Post