Skip to main content

Fernando, is there anything specific that makes you say "Could it be this 'people of color' issue is aggravating leadership & political dynamics in our spiritual church body?"

Fernando, you did more than wonder.  You led us in a specific direction when you said, '"Could it be this 'people of color' issue is aggravating leadership & political dynamics in our spiritual church body?"  That's why I asked if you had anything specific that made you say this.   It sounds as if you're playing the race card.

It sounds so wonderful to say "Scripture alone should be our guide."  Would any Christian deny that?   Difficulty arises because various people say, "This is what Scripture says."   The result is that there are multiple assertions about what Scripture says.  In the face of that reality, it's pretty meaningless to say, "Scripture alone should be our guide."  What Scripture are  we then talking about--interpretation A, B, C, D or my own interpretation?

Some folks object to creeds and say, "No creed but Christ!"  When you ask them what they believe about Christ, they say: He is the divine Son of God who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, buried, resurrected, sits at God's right hand and is coming again."  In other words they construct what we know as the Apostles' Creed.

The church adopts creeds and confessions, not to supplant Scripture, but to say, "We believe this is what Scripture says."The Belgic Confession says that Scripture is the supreme authority in a Christian's life.  To say "I subscribe to that" in no way takes away from the authority of Scripture.

The committee that designed the one-week synod recommended that the 12 people who received the highest nominating votes of the delegates be placed on the ballot.  In an overture to synod Classis Lake Erie observed that this would almost certainly guarantee that all the officers would be ministers since ministers are more well known denomination wide than are elders.  The overture asked that three elders be placed on each ballot no matter how their vote totals compared to those of ministers.  Thus, three elders who receive the highest number of nomination votes are placed on each ballot.  If three elders are not nominated by the delegates, ministers are added so each ballot has 12 names.  This has made a big difference in the leadership of synod because since this provision has been in place elders have served regularly as one of synod's officers.

Rob:

You allude to Church Order Article 29: "The decisions of the assemblies shall be considered settled and binding, unless it is proved that they conflict with the Word of God or the Church Order."

Article 31 is also relevant: "A request for revision of a decision shall be submitted to the assembly which made the decision.  Such a request shall be honored only if sufficient and new grounds for reconsideration are presented."

In a sense the overture looks like something new because it's asking for a revision of Article 47, and that approach hasn't  been used before.  In essence, however, this is an old request, one that has no new grounds and one that's been defeated twenty times by synods in our recent past.

Generally, the executive director is hesitant to rule overtures not legally before synod because it appears high-handed.  But you are correct, the officers of synod may recommend to the body that particular overtures are not legally before the body.  I think that's fairly rare, too.  Usually, the advisory committee to which such an overture is assigned will make that recommendation to the floor. 

We want to hear from you.

Connect to The Network and add your own question, blog, resource, or job.

Add Your Post