Skip to main content

I think Mr. Van Surksum has a valid point.  I believe that the  composers of the Belhar were trying stress that God is on the side of justice and freedom, and maybe the problem is that they use the word "constraint" with a very specific idea in mind, ie. the evils produced by Apartheid. And certainly in that context, their statement makes sense; if two races are treated seperately and very unequally how can there be unity between the two groups. 

The problem, then, is that the authors of the Belhar Confession were really addressing a particularly unjust political, social, and religious situation and the document is designed to support the abolishion of that situation.  But the confession does not put forth a universal and timeless set of truths as the other Christian confessions do.  Therefore, while it may be an admirable statement, it is applicable only to the time and environment in which it was generated.

It should not be included in the church's set of important creeds and confessions.

Respectfully,

Bill Durkin

I think many denominations have this problem.  Too often the roles are not based on biblical definitions but on tradition, a tradition that might have evolved only in the last generation.  And too often that tradition is more of an organizational or business tradition than what God calls us to be.  Yearly examination of the roles against scripture would be an excellent practice.

We want to hear from you.

Connect to The Network and add your own question, blog, resource, or job.

Add Your Post