Military chaplains in the CRCNA at nearing a crossroads. In the near future, our CRC Chaplaincy Committee will have to provide a statement to the Department of Defense regarding what we can and cannot do regarding ministry to and with persons in same-sex relationships.
Many of the issues are black and white. For example, we are not permitted to officiate at a same sex marriage ceremony. However, some issues are less clear. For example, can we co-celebrate communion with another chaplain who comes from a denomination that endorses same-sex relationships? Is there a difference between co-celebrating with a heterosexual UCC pastor or a practicing gay UCC pastor? Both would endorse same-sex relationships, but only one actually practices it.
We are hesitant to make agreement on same-sex relationships the litmus test of whether or not we co-celebrate communion. Although it is a hot issue, I don't think that it is on the level of core doctrines like justification by faith, the virgin birth, or the inspiration of scripture.
What guidance does our church order have for us? Your thoughts would help us in the process of formulating a policy that would be sensitive to multi-denominational environment in which we operate each day.
I really appreciate this forum, the contributors and the discussion. As one of the CRC’s full-time military chaplains, it is easy to lose touch with the discussions that are happening in the church, and this site helps bridge the gap for me.
Regarding this issue of supervision, I have spent most of my 14 years as a pastor under some type of supervision, starting with internship during CTS, followed by several years of mentoring and supervision under a senior pastor in of our CRC congregations. My current calling to chaplaincy also has a robust supervisory element – I am supervised by a senior chaplain as well as reporting directly (daily, in fact) to the commanding officer of my military unit.
When I graduated from CTS in 1998, several friends, classmates and family members expressed surprise at my decision to accept a call to a church where I would be in a supervised staff position. Many told me that I needed to "get in the pastoral saddle" and become a solo pastor for in order to develop my own pastoral identity. Now, 14 years later I am very glad that I decided to begin full-time minsitry in a supervised position; good supervision has been a major part of my development as a pastor and also saved me and others from the pain of many mistakes I would have made. While I do not doubt that many of my seminary classmates who went to solo pastorates also developed a healthy pastoral identity, supervision was and continues to be a part of my pastoral development.
In my experience, successful supervisory relationships require 1) a pastor who welcomes and seeks supervision, and 2) an institution which structurally or organically empowers or encourages healthy supervision. Is it fair to say that a pastor who wants supervision needs to seek it out? (In some geographically isolated areas, finding good supervisors might be difficult.) Why has ministry supervision been such a positive experience for me? Because it was not imposed on me; I wanted it - not just for myself but for the good of the people I serve. Perhaps one of the qualities we should look for in our ministerial candidates is a desire for supervision and a track record of seeking out mentors, spiritual directors or others who help our ongoing pastoral development. We should take extra caution when examining candidates who are opposed to supervision or avoid it.
I do not think that a denominationally driven supervisory structure is the answer. Several of my Navy Chaplain Corps colleagues have very dysfunctional relationships with their bishops or appointed supervisors. A pastor who wants and seeks supervision is key.
Here's the other side of the equation – how well do we train supervisors? Do we have an adequate concept of what a good supervisor does? Who she or he IS? Do we have any institutional capacity builders for healthy supervision? In the Navy Chaplain Corps, newly promoted chaplain officers attend a month-long supervisory course to learn how to properly supervise junior chaplains. Continuing education for supervisors is an important piece of us to consider. Expanded training at Classis to help churches understand the need for supervision and continuing education would also be helpful.
Again, I appreciate this discussion forum and look forward to your responses.
One more thought ... are there data that demonstrate a correlation between good supervision and longevity in ministry? If we can show a correlation between these two, we could move the supervision discussion from "it sounds like a worthwhile idea" to "we must develop our supervisory capacity" for the good of the pastors and the churches.
I remember at CTS that we would frequently do pastoral case conferences. This was a good model in which peers mentored each other and supervision occurred in a group setting. Groups of pastors, with a seasoned pastor as leader, could fulfill this supervisory role very well, and it would fit well in our polity; something like a modified CPE on a Classis level.
Posted in: CRC Church Order Commentary
Professor DeMoor,
Military chaplains in the CRCNA at nearing a crossroads. In the near future, our CRC Chaplaincy Committee will have to provide a statement to the Department of Defense regarding what we can and cannot do regarding ministry to and with persons in same-sex relationships.
Many of the issues are black and white. For example, we are not permitted to officiate at a same sex marriage ceremony. However, some issues are less clear. For example, can we co-celebrate communion with another chaplain who comes from a denomination that endorses same-sex relationships? Is there a difference between co-celebrating with a heterosexual UCC pastor or a practicing gay UCC pastor? Both would endorse same-sex relationships, but only one actually practices it.
We are hesitant to make agreement on same-sex relationships the litmus test of whether or not we co-celebrate communion. Although it is a hot issue, I don't think that it is on the level of core doctrines like justification by faith, the virgin birth, or the inspiration of scripture.
What guidance does our church order have for us? Your thoughts would help us in the process of formulating a policy that would be sensitive to multi-denominational environment in which we operate each day.
Dave Jeltema
Chaplain, US Navy
Posted in: Do Pastors Need Professional Supervision?
Colleagues,
I really appreciate this forum, the contributors and the discussion. As one of the CRC’s full-time military chaplains, it is easy to lose touch with the discussions that are happening in the church, and this site helps bridge the gap for me.
Regarding this issue of supervision, I have spent most of my 14 years as a pastor under some type of supervision, starting with internship during CTS, followed by several years of mentoring and supervision under a senior pastor in of our CRC congregations. My current calling to chaplaincy also has a robust supervisory element – I am supervised by a senior chaplain as well as reporting directly (daily, in fact) to the commanding officer of my military unit.
When I graduated from CTS in 1998, several friends, classmates and family members expressed surprise at my decision to accept a call to a church where I would be in a supervised staff position. Many told me that I needed to "get in the pastoral saddle" and become a solo pastor for in order to develop my own pastoral identity. Now, 14 years later I am very glad that I decided to begin full-time minsitry in a supervised position; good supervision has been a major part of my development as a pastor and also saved me and others from the pain of many mistakes I would have made. While I do not doubt that many of my seminary classmates who went to solo pastorates also developed a healthy pastoral identity, supervision was and continues to be a part of my pastoral development.
In my experience, successful supervisory relationships require 1) a pastor who welcomes and seeks supervision, and 2) an institution which structurally or organically empowers or encourages healthy supervision. Is it fair to say that a pastor who wants supervision needs to seek it out? (In some geographically isolated areas, finding good supervisors might be difficult.) Why has ministry supervision been such a positive experience for me? Because it was not imposed on me; I wanted it - not just for myself but for the good of the people I serve. Perhaps one of the qualities we should look for in our ministerial candidates is a desire for supervision and a track record of seeking out mentors, spiritual directors or others who help our ongoing pastoral development. We should take extra caution when examining candidates who are opposed to supervision or avoid it.
I do not think that a denominationally driven supervisory structure is the answer. Several of my Navy Chaplain Corps colleagues have very dysfunctional relationships with their bishops or appointed supervisors. A pastor who wants and seeks supervision is key.
Here's the other side of the equation – how well do we train supervisors? Do we have an adequate concept of what a good supervisor does? Who she or he IS? Do we have any institutional capacity builders for healthy supervision? In the Navy Chaplain Corps, newly promoted chaplain officers attend a month-long supervisory course to learn how to properly supervise junior chaplains. Continuing education for supervisors is an important piece of us to consider. Expanded training at Classis to help churches understand the need for supervision and continuing education would also be helpful.
Again, I appreciate this discussion forum and look forward to your responses.
Chaps out ...
Posted in: Do Pastors Need Professional Supervision?
One more thought ... are there data that demonstrate a correlation between good supervision and longevity in ministry? If we can show a correlation between these two, we could move the supervision discussion from "it sounds like a worthwhile idea" to "we must develop our supervisory capacity" for the good of the pastors and the churches.
I remember at CTS that we would frequently do pastoral case conferences. This was a good model in which peers mentored each other and supervision occurred in a group setting. Groups of pastors, with a seasoned pastor as leader, could fulfill this supervisory role very well, and it would fit well in our polity; something like a modified CPE on a Classis level.
...Enough from the good idea fairy.