Freedom of Expression

  240 views

We take it for granted too easily…but we live in a country that champions freedom of exchange of information. It underlies all other freedoms in society. The roads to dictatorships have mostly been paved by one or other faction holding the press captive. It is through this freedom that citizens can be challenged to lend or deny their support to the many ideals that sustain society’s functioning. The quality of public morality is served by citizens having the freedom to express and defend whatever values of excellence they champion. Ideals can only prove their worth when they are exposed to the judgment of thoughtful men and women through the freedom of expression.

Allow me to share a modest experience I had in this respect. It concerns the reality of the preponderance of hand-guns in the land and the many deaths in its wake. I realize that not even believers can agree on the matter of guns. But, I thought, curbing guns would save lives. I thought that it is a matter of public morality. So I started a correspondence with our Congressman. From my view point, limiting of distribution of hand-guns will not happen unless Congress takes action. Hence my contact with our local Congressman. He was very prompt in answering my mail. And it was plain that he answered with care. He assured me of his concern. I found this form of contact very encouraging.

But I also learned that the exchange about ideals is not simple. The possibilities are many. Patterns will arise. In the case of my Congressman it was that he related every concern I addressed to him to an existing law or a Federal program. I had hoped that, as an elected representative, he would have evidenced some prophetic qualities in his answers, but he shied away from that.

As we discussed the gun issue, I suggested that guns and fire-arms should be made less readily available. He responded by quoting the Law. He referred to the Second Amendment and constitutional rights, etc. I asked how he personally felt about it and would he publicly defend his convictions. That’s when he became very guarded. He, of course, was very aware of a multitude of different opinions among his constituents. Some feel strongly that the Second Amendment must be defended at all cost. They connect it with personal safety. Others – of whom I am one – point out that the US has, proportionately, the highest number of guns among its citizen, but also the highest number of killings. It’s a vicious circle: the more guns, the more killings, the more killings, the more guns. But the Scandinavian nations bear out that fewer guns result in fewer killings. Are Scandinavians better people than Americans…?

The Christian Reformed Church has always been concerned about sounding a biblical testimony in the face of society’s moral issues. I sat in on some of the discussion that preceded actual expressions. That’s when I became aware of the difficulty of formulating Christian positions and answers. And even among Christians there are many differences of view-point. But even so it is helpful that believers discuss issues together.

In the meantime I will remain in contact with our Congressman. I will encourage him to quote more than existing laws, but to be a proponent of moral excellence and to challenge his constituents accordingly. And I think that he will appreciate it.      

Posted in:
Image Credit

The Network hosts user-submitted content.
Posts don't necessarily imply CRCNA endorsement, but must comply with our community guidelines.

Let's Discuss…

We love your comments! Thanks for your help upholding the Community Guidelines to make this an encouraging and respectful community for everyone.
Community Builder

What an insightful article.  Indeed, political questions can and usually are far more complex than meets an individual's eye.  And Christians,  even CRCers, rarely agree with each other about the correct answers to almost all political questions.

Synods, the CRCNA and CRCNA Agencies might take this article to heart when tempted to declare and publicly advocate/lobby about political conclusions obvious to them.

Ron Fisher on January 26m 2016

Did your congressman recognize that the 2nd amendment refers to the members of military or those empowered by government right to bear arms?  It was never intgended that every Tom, Dick & Harry could walk around with firearms.

Community Builder

 Yes, the U.S.A. are a champion of civic and individual rights, and some, unfortunately, use that freedom to appeal to the worst in human nature.  I don't have to name names. If people have been paying the least bit attention to the news, they will know who I'm referring to.  And frankly, I hope that American CRC people at least, will exercise caution and wisdom in whom they vote for next November, for although the rest of the world has no say in who becomes the next president of your country, your choice will impact the whole planet for at least four years.