Skip to main content

This year marks the 1700th anniversary of the Nicene Creed, one of the Christian Reformed Church in North America’s foundational statements of faith. The Nicene Creed, produced by the Council of Nicea, roots our denomination in a tradition that from the start sought to establish a standard for biblical and theological orthodoxy that applies to all Christians. The Creed presents, in enduringly accessible and poetically concise language, the “non-negotiables” of what Christians believe. As is the case with all our historic forms of unity, the Nicene Creed is at risk of being neglected by today’s churchgoers. When we neglect these forms we rob ourselves of resources that both inform our faith and unite us as believers. What better occasion than a milestone anniversary to revisit a defining theological masterwork that invites us to reimagine and celebrate our place in the world- and history-wide body of Christ? 

In pursuit of these values, Synod 2025 resolved to “…instruct the Office of the General Secretary to identify resources and suggest ways for our classes and churches to commemorate and teach the 1,700th anniversary of the Nicene Creed…” (Acts of Synod 2025, p.651)

With this in mind, we’ve curated the following collection of resources, with the caveat that not all of them may fit every CRC context. Our hope is that you discover ways to engage with the Nicene Creed and incorporate it into your congregational and devotional practices this year. We also invite you to share any resources you’ve discovered by posting titles and links in the Comments section.

In Christ,

Your fellow servants in the Office of General Secretary

Conference:

Resource Roundups: 

Worship Service Materials:  

Music: 

Articles and Books: 

Comments

In case anyone wants a short context for the purpose of the Nicene Creed: here is a list of the heresies it was addressing... I have done my own research on this, but Grok summarizes this way better, faster & shorter than I can... 

I find it fascinating and heartbreaking we are dealing with some of the same beliefs today... Ie eternal subordination of the Son (ESS) to limit women's serving in the church in certain ways (this is an entire discussion on its own even today still!).

The following is the Grok/AI compilation that I have researched in the past, but would take me awhile to compile:

The Nicene Creed, established at the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD, was primarily formulated to address theological disputes, particularly those concerning the nature of Christ and the Trinity. Below is a list of the major heresies it aimed to counter, based on the theological context of the time:

  1. Arianism
    • Description: Taught by Arius, a presbyter from Alexandria, Arianism claimed that the Son (Jesus Christ) was a created being, subordinate to the Father, and not co-eternal or consubstantial with Him. Arius argued that "there was a time when the Son was not," denying the full divinity of Christ.
    • Nicene Response: The Creed affirms that the Son is "begotten, not made, consubstantial with the Father," emphasizing Christ's full divinity, co-eternity, and equality with the Father.
  2. Sabellianism (Modalism)
    • Description: Also known as Modalistic Monarchianism, Sabellianism taught that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are not distinct persons but different modes or manifestations of a single divine being. This denied the distinct personhood within the Trinity.
    • Nicene Response: The Creed clearly delineates the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as distinct entities while affirming their unity in one Godhead, countering the idea of God merely appearing in different forms.
  3. Adoptionism (Dynamic Monarchianism)
    • Description: This heresy posited that Jesus was a human who was "adopted" by God at a point in time (e.g., at his baptism or resurrection), receiving divine power but not being divine by nature.
    • Nicene Response: The Creed declares that the Son is "true God from true God," eternally begotten and divine by nature, not a human elevated to divine status.
  4. Gnosticism
    • Description: While not the primary focus, Gnostic influences lingered, teaching that the material world was evil and that Christ was a purely spiritual being who only appeared human (Docetism, a Gnostic variant). This denied the true incarnation of Christ.
    • Nicene Response: The Creed emphasizes that the Son "became incarnate" and "was made man," affirming the reality of Christ's human nature alongside his divine nature.
  5. Subordinationism
    • Description: A broader tendency in some early Christian thought to view the Son and Holy Spirit as subordinate to the Father in essence or rank, even if not as extreme as Arianism.
    • Nicene Response: The Creed’s use of "consubstantial" (homoousios) ensures that the Son is of the same essence as the Father, rejecting any hierarchy of essence within the Trinity.

Context and Notes:

  • The Council of Nicaea was convened by Emperor Constantine to resolve disputes, particularly Arianism, which was causing significant division in the early Church.
  • The Creed was later expanded at the Council of Constantinople (381 AD) to further clarify the role of the Holy Spirit, addressing additional heresies like Macedonianism (which denied the divinity of the Holy Spirit).
  • The primary focus in 325 AD was Arianism, as it posed the most immediate threat to orthodox Christian doctrine regarding Christ’s nature.

This list is based on historical accounts of the theological debates surrounding the Council of Nicaea, as found in early Church writings and scholarly analyses of the period. If you’d like a deeper dive into any specific heresy or the Creed’s phrasing, let me know!

The second aspect I find interesting and will share is the 20 canons that the Nicene Council also made along with the Creed. Nicaea - Canons of the 325 Council

These canons seem to have been ignored for the most part unlike the Canons of Dort. I find the Nicene Canons are quite helpful in giving additional context for what the early church was dealing with at the time.  #1 Castration? #19 Paulianists (a different Paul than the Apostle Paul)? deaconesses?  The contexts for these are very, very interesting and insightful and help us better understand other difficult texts of the New Testament, such as Paul's letter to Timothy.

Let's Discuss

We love your comments! Thank you for helping us uphold the Community Guidelines to make this an encouraging and respectful community for everyone.

Login or Register to Comment

Latest in Creeds and Confessions

We want to hear from you.

Connect to The Network and add your own question, blog, resource, or job.

Add Your Post