Skip to main content

Jeff,

I think you--and others--might appreciate and benefit by reading a letter written in 1939 by deacon Hendrik Schoonekamp about the need for and importance of deacon inclusion and representation. You can read it on The Network's page for Deacons here.

To those who might have missed it, there is a post on The Network's site for Deacons entitled, "What's Up With Deacons Going To Synod?." The post itself is a letter written to CRC Deacons by The Task Force to Study the Offices of Elder and Deacon. Given the interest sparked by this particular post, I think anyone wanting to better understand this issue might find it helpful. You can get directly to the post by going here. You might also be interested in reading a letter written in 1939 by a deacon that addresses the matter of deacon inclusion/representation also posted on the page for deacons here.

 


John Klein-Geltink, a deacon from Classis Chatham, emailed his response to this post and asked me to share it here--for some reason he was unable to post it directly.


Hello Jack
When I read the report I was rather put off as are other deacons.For the past 13 years a number of deacons of Classis Chatham have served on the Classis Chatham Ministry Committee and attended Classis meetings and voted on all matters. We even asked to set time at classis to have churches share Diaconial ministry at local communities,which did happen at our last May meeting.Deacons also designed questions to be discussed at Church visits about the nature of diaconial work in their commuttees.So I am not sure what Norman is talking about.
 

If, as some suggest, the roles and responsibilities of the offices reflect or are intended to reflect and perform the functions of Christ as prophet (pastor), priest (deacon) and king (elder), what does it say about our denomination's view of the role and responsibilities of the deacon (priest) when we don't include them and give them a voice and vote at synod?

Terry,

Thanks for "jumping in" to share your perspectives and thoughts as someone who has been intimately involved in this process for several years now. I am grateful for interest and responses that Norman's post has generated thus far. I encourage those who are following this conversation to share their thoughts on the post itself or in response to any of the comments made thus far. 

Abigail,

Thank you for writing about a subject that a growing number of people are doing or preparing to do, i.e., raising support for the work to which God has called or is calling them.

Having done what is commonly called "fundraising" for many years and for various Christian causes, I know that many--and probably most--Christians are acutely uncomfortable with and hesitant to "ask" for financial support. (Even though I have been at it and even guided others along the way, I still get "sweaty palms" before I talk to somebody--often as a "follow up" to a letter I wrote.) I appreciate how you came to understand how important it is to view supporters as the essential partners that they are. It's important for me to remember that asking for support is or should be more about providing someone with an opportunity and invitation to support and participate in God's work than it is about supporting me and my work. Additionally, praying for and trusting God to guide the prospective donor in their decision helps me remember that my primary job is to present the opportunity . . . whether and/or how much someone gives is God's job.

Steve,

 

 

Thanks so much for your response to this post. I'm sorry I didn't see and respond to it sooner. 

I really appreciate your thoughts and suggestions regarding the use of a "Micah 6:8 principle" as a reminder and  guide in all we do and how we do it as reflections and servants of Christ.

Jack

 

 

 

 

Thanks for sharing this Kris! I think that event was a positive example of collaboration among organizations and neighbors to raise awareness about an important justice issue in the U.S. today. Interestingly, on the topic of immigration justice, Tim Keller makes a very compelling case from Scripture-- in Generous Justice--that how we welcome, treat, care for and include the immigrant/stranger/alien (as one of the groups in what he refers to as the "quartet of the vulnerable") is an indicator as well as a demonstration of our relationship with and love for God.  

I believe the question as formulated is highly provocative, insensitive, and (IMHO) inappropriate for just about any discussion forum. . . . especially one focussed specifically on racial reconciliation and anti-racism.  I hope--perhaps somewhat naively--that all who post questions or comments would give careful consideration and use the acronym "THiNK" before posting anything. Ask yourself, is it

1.) True

2.) Helpful 

3.) Necessary 

4.) Kind

Grace & Peace,

Jack

P.S. the grio just posted what I think is a more balanced report about the hysteria over the alleged incidents of "knockout" that have occurred.  You can read it by clcking on this link

We want to hear from you.

Connect to The Network and add your own question, blog, resource, or job.

Add Your Post