Skip to main content

Background: from November 2020 to June 2022, nearly 2500 people from more than 80 CRC congregations participated in Challenging Conversations listening circles. These circles helped participants listen deeply to each other and to the Human Sexuality Report as they prepared for Synod to meet in June 2022. Pastor Church Resources has now launched Challenging Conversations: Next Steps Discernment, a substantial revision and expansion of Challenging Conversations intended to help you hold grace and truth as you discern and decide what Synod’s decision means for you or your church.

Our Anxious Moment

In June 2022, the synod of the Christian Reformed Church made a series of consequential decisions about the denomination’s teaching (and the confessional status of the church’s teaching) on human sexuality and same-sex marriage. In this season after synod’s decisions, you may be wondering how those decisions will impact you and your church. 

Many are feeling some anxiety about what Synod’s decisions may or may not mean for them or their congregation. Yet no two individuals and no two congregations are feeling that anxiety in exactly the same way or with exactly the same dynamics or consequences. 

At some churches, though most people may basically agree with Synod’s decisions, they are feeling overwhelmed by the practical and pastoral challenge of living into this vision well. 

At other churches, the decisions of Synod may feel like an imposition. Now, members and ministry leaders are asking whether they can remain a part of a congregation with which they might disagree on this issue. 

In these and more churches, leaders are wondering how much difference in belief with each other or with our denomination we can live with, and how, practically, we can live with that difference. 

Our Naturally Unhelpful Reactions

When faced with anxiety in our churches, most of our natural reactions prove quite unhelpful. We are tempted to run away, shut down, or pick a fight. We begin to see the world in simplistic, black/white, good/bad terms. We feel like we have to pick a side, and we feel like there are only two sides. We start attributing all kinds of negative motivations to those with whom we disagree. Our capacity for creativity is diminished. Our willingness to love fades. 

As leaders in anxious times, we vacillate between avoiding the issues and hoping they go away on the one hand or trying to control people and outcomes on the other hand. We are eager to relieve the tension and we are tempted to cut corners to do so. We wonder if the right, good or true ends might justify some less-than-Christlike means

And so, right when we most need the trust of our congregations, we act in ways that corrode trust.

Maybe we rush the decision-making process along, without considering the consequences of those decisions.

Maybe we hush important voices: we don’t listen deeply or well to the voices we most need to hear. We are not attentive to God’s voice and we are not intentional about hearing the voice of others affected by our decision.

Meanwhile, we may start cutting corners in the decision-making process itself. The process may become mush: it is unclear who has the authority to decide; it is unclear when, how, or if people will have the opportunity to speak into the discernment. It is unclear what the decision even means. 

The impact of rush, hush and mush on a congregation is to diminish trust and sow confusion and frustration, even among those who basically agree with whatever decision is ultimately made. 

A Better Way? 

What if it didn’t need to be this way? 

What if the anxiety and conflict of this moment were not a distraction from your church’s witness and discipleship, but what if they were actually an opportunity for making better disciples and offering a more winsome witness to the world? After all, aren’t most of the instructions we have about Christian life together written in the form of letters to first-century congregations experiencing conflicts and tension of their own? 

What if God knew that it would be hard to “bear with one another” and “submit to one another” and “be kind and compassionate to one another.” What if those commands were not for after the conflict subsided and the differences disappeared but for during the conflict and while the differences persisted? 

What if God used challenging seasons like these to deepen our dependence on him and build up our capacity to “have the same mindset as Christ Jesus?” 

What if there were a way to love each other well even if we still come to the conclusion that we cannot stay together as we once were? 

What if we could hear not just the most strident and polarized voices but also all the voices in between?

What if we acted as though God’s voice really was the voice we most needed to hear and follow?

An Alternative Way Forward

In Ephesians 4, Paul pleads with the church to “make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace.” Maybe it is unrealistic to expect us to make every effort. But can we make some effort? Is this, perhaps, the season for making an effort?

Next Steps Discernment cannot make your differences and disagreements magically go away. It cannot guarantee you’ll stay together; it cannot ensure a happy outcome. But this process does give you a chance to make an effort: to lean into the challenge of this moment in a way that is oriented to Christ and insistent on exhibiting Christlike love and humility. 

Next Steps

Next Steps exists to supplement your council’s decision making about next steps by providing practices, prompts, and a pathway for intentional congregational discernment. When followed, Next Steps should help your church clarify core issues, generate trust, and honor God, regardless of what final decision is adopted. 

To sign up for facilitator and council training, register here

To read answers to frequently asked questions, visit our FAQ section

If you have other questions, email us at [email protected].


Brothers and Sisters in  Christ,

I've been thinking about the last three or four decades of the CRCNA and am thinking it likely that we might see an exodus from the church's left-wing because of our inability to break bread together over the sexuality issue much as we saw an exodus in the 1990s and 2000s from the right wing over the issue of WICO. The loss of the right wing in the last decades greatly hurt the church. The caucus of the left was maybe jubilant for a while thinking we finally had our backdoor revival. But synod, after The URC and MARS formed, was never nearly so fruitful or mission minded--that split was certainly a marker on our long decline as a denomination. Remember "400,000 by 2000!" In some ways it seemed as if our heart were cut out and all ministry became "local" in a selfish way. It wasn't even fun to go to Synod anymore. 

Now, if we take what Synod 2022 said seriously, (and we must or let's not even pretend that we are a creedal denomination anymore), concerning the fact that practicing homosexuality was a matter of the confessions and a violation of the seventh commandment as described in the Heidelberg catechism, we will lose another substantial part of the church. We have probably 30 to 40 percent of our Calvin University and Seminary professors who can no longer sign with good conscience the form of subscription. We will lose our left-wing too and become a flightless, pathetic thing that used to call itself a significant denomination.

I fear what will remain will be two (again polarized) groups that might well soon decide they can't  break Bread either:

1) the old guard CRC, much like that of our parents, who believed in the biblical covenants and in conventionally married two parent families, Christian education, strong involvement in and support of a local creedal CRC, with a firm belief in the need for an educated clergy, and local leadership that took the calling very seriously.

2) that significant part of the current CRC that considers itself "Christian Nationalist" most importantly.

So what we might have before us is four tiny and victimized fellowships that think little of Christ's mission and only of the most recent wounds inflicted on us by "the other".

 I greatly hope that such initiatives as you suggest in this might actually loosen some of our stiff necked character  (part of which might be ethnically based) and change minds. I fear though that if your aim is to get us to put our differences behind us, assume some sort of "local option"  and amble sweetly into the future in order to do meaningful ministry together, we can't, we won't. 
Yours In Christ,
Rev. John F Schuurman

Rev John F Schuurman I can not agree more with your well written article(?) I think advice is a better word. The Church has split, it split a long time ago and the leadership has only parted the sea even further. Who's next on the "banned" list? yes call it what you like it is what it truly is and should be called what it is - a banishment. 

Jesus said let the children come to me. What he was saying for the Father, all people are my children let them come to me!

With Love and Peace

Jeffrey Thomson

Question: What happened to previous posts on this topic? Mine is gone? could someone explained what happened? Was it because I made a heartfelt plead to not punish God's Children - for we are all God's Children, the "perfect Ones" and the "Not so perfect" (that means all of us). Jesus sat broke bread, drank wine with all kinds of people, why are we not trying to be like our Saviour?

My previous post was much longer with many references, citations etc...

I hope this one stays up.

With Love and Peace


Jeffrey Thomson


Let's Discuss

We love your comments! Thank you for helping us uphold the Community Guidelines to make this an encouraging and respectful community for everyone.

Login or Register to Comment

We want to hear from you.

Connect to The Network and add your own question, blog, resource, or job.

Add Your Post